2005
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of protein-DNA interactions using an optimized knowledge-based potential

Abstract: Computational evaluation of protein–DNA interaction is important for the identification of DNA-binding sites and genome annotation. It could validate the predicted binding motifs by sequence-based approaches through the calculation of the binding affinity between a protein and DNA. Such an evaluation should take into account structural information to deal with the complicated effects from DNA structural deformation, distance-dependent multi-body interactions and solvation contributions. In this paper, we prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
83
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More details were presented in our previous papers [26,29]. The initial knowledge-based atom-pair potentials were extracted from the structural data of the training set with Boltzmann relation [27,28,38,[45][46][47][48][49]. That is…”
Section: Optimization Of the Scoring Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details were presented in our previous papers [26,29]. The initial knowledge-based atom-pair potentials were extracted from the structural data of the training set with Boltzmann relation [27,28,38,[45][46][47][48][49]. That is…”
Section: Optimization Of the Scoring Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of different energy terms in our energy function were determined through finding the best threading alignments and sidechain packing on a training set, using a technique called Z-score optimization [37], [38]. The training set consists of 164 selected pairs of query sequence-template structures; 100 random decoy alignments were generated for each pair.…”
Section: Formulation Of the New Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Z score optimization of energy weights: The weights of different energy terms in our energy function were determined through finding the best threading alignments and side-chain packing on a training set, using a technique called Z-score optimization [37,38]. The training set consists of 164 selected pairs of query sequence-template structure, 100 random decoy alignments were generated for each pair.…”
Section: Formulation Of the New Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%