2018
DOI: 10.1101/378927
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of ontology design patterns for combining pathology and anatomy ontologies

Abstract: Data are increasingly annotated with multiple ontologies to capture rich information about the features of the subject under investigation. Analysis may be performed over each ontology separately, but, recently, there has been a move to combine multiple ontologies to provide more powerful analytical possibilities. However, it is often not clear how to combine ontologies or how to assess or evaluate the potential design patterns available. Here we use a large and well-characterized dataset of anatomic pathology… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Vascular lesions were coded to the Mouse Pathology (MPATH) and Mouse Anatomy (MA) ontologies as previously described, 29,33 and anatomical location and pathological diagnoses were combined into the precomposed PAM ontology, which classifies lesions from MPATH by anatomical site using the MA ontology. 1 Overrepresentation was calculated using the Ontofunc and Func tools 14 as described previously. 1 We performed a hypergeometric test to establish the strains in which vascular lesions are overrepresented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Vascular lesions were coded to the Mouse Pathology (MPATH) and Mouse Anatomy (MA) ontologies as previously described, 29,33 and anatomical location and pathological diagnoses were combined into the precomposed PAM ontology, which classifies lesions from MPATH by anatomical site using the MA ontology. 1 Overrepresentation was calculated using the Ontofunc and Func tools 14 as described previously. 1 We performed a hypergeometric test to establish the strains in which vascular lesions are overrepresented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Overrepresentation was calculated using the Ontofunc and Func tools 14 as described previously. 1 We performed a hypergeometric test to establish the strains in which vascular lesions are overrepresented. The P value obtained indicates which strains and sex have disproportionately frequent vascular lesions of all types with respect to all the strains examined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Internet of Things (IoT) environments, ensuring interoperability is challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of data from devices like health and fitness trackers. Proprietary formats and lack of common terms often lead to certain challenges related to communication protocols and data formats [10]. Overcoming these challenges requires adopting common syntax and semantics for IoT-generated data.…”
Section: Symbolic Ai and Ontology Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, significant efforts have been made to enrich ontologies by incorporating formalized background knowledge as well as meta-data that improve accessibility and utility of the ontologies (Smith et al, 2007;Mungall et al, 2011). Incorporation of formal axioms contributes to detecting whether ontologies are consistent (Smith et al, 2003;Smith and Brochhausen, 2010;Stevens et al, 2003), enables automated reasoning and expressive queries (Hoehndorf et al, 2015a;da Silva et al, 2017;Jupp et al, 2012), facilitates connecting and integrating ontologies of different domains through the application of ontology design patterns (Osumi-Sutherland et al, 2017;Hoehndorf et al, 2010), and can be used to guide ontology development (Köhler et al, 2013;Alghamdi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%