2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02396.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of functional limitation of upper limb movements in subjects affected by ataxia

Abstract: The proposed protocol allows the quantitative characterization of the motion pattern of ataxic subjects in a non-invasive way. We believe that this analysis could represent a good tool for ataxia evaluation in a clinical context such as neurorehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Most previous attempts to measure cerebellar ataxia severity have focused on fluctuation, movement oscillation, or increased time to complete a specific manual task. 4,6,16 However, any one of these tests does not identify ataxia because these abnormalities may reflect reduced performance associated with other motor disorders. The aim of this study was to identify cerebellar ataxia and identify major pathological movement components related to ataxia severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Most previous attempts to measure cerebellar ataxia severity have focused on fluctuation, movement oscillation, or increased time to complete a specific manual task. 4,6,16 However, any one of these tests does not identify ataxia because these abnormalities may reflect reduced performance associated with other motor disorders. The aim of this study was to identify cerebellar ataxia and identify major pathological movement components related to ataxia severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CVs for the pen-tip velocity variability parameter were 16.5% to 21.4% (mean = 18.2%, SD = 1.5%), and CV of those means for 10 trials was 18.1%. CVs of the track shape variability parameter were 12.5% to 16.7% (mean = 14.0%, SD = 1.3%), and CV of those means for 10 trials was 14.0%. With respect to movement correlations of the pen tip with the finger/wrist, CVs of the cosine parameter for the pen-tip/finger were 9.9% to 13.9% (mean = 12.5%, SD = 1.4%) and CV of those means for 10 trials was 12.4%.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Handwriting Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D marker coordinates were filtered by means of a low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 10 Hz [8]. Each movement was then divided into three main phases: going phase (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markers were placed on specific body landmarks according to the following marker set [7][8]: on C7, on the sternum, acromion, elbow, ulnar and radial styloid processes, second metacarpal head and on the end of the stick that replaced the forefinger (fingertip). Additional markers were placed on the screen and on the target for the initial calibration.…”
Section: B Eeg and Optoelectronic Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also a pilot study and case series on sensorimotor deficits in Down Syndrome, the aim is to use motion analysis approach to evidence, in a quantitative way, the biomechanical alterations in a drawing test through the application of NMT: the drawing test permitted the participants to focus their attention on a distal joint, where the contribution of skin receptors in kinesthesia assumes relevance as the muscle spindles usually have [9]. These study specific application processes of a NMT in specific therapeutic areas it has already been shown a certain improvement in mobility and lymphatic drainage [10][11][12]. The study was focused on neuro-rehabilitation, quantifying the efficacy of Neuromuscular Taping as a treatment method combined with physical therapy rehabilitation as a means of reducing pain symptoms in post amputation of lower limb subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%