Quantitative Evaluation of Atlas-based Attenuation Correction for Brain PET in an Integrated Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging System

Abstract

Purpose To assess the patient-dependent accuracy of atlas-based attenuation correction (ATAC) for brain positron emission tomography (PET) in an integrated time-of-flight (TOF) PET/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system. Materials and Methods Thirty recruited patients provided informed consent in this institutional review board-approved study. All patients underwent whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) followed by TOF PET/MR imaging. With use of TOF PET data, PET images were reconstructed with four different attenuation correction (AC) methods: PET with patient CT-based AC (CTAC), PET with ATAC (air and bone from an atlas), PET with ATAC (air and tissue from the atlas with patient bone), and PET with ATAC (air and tissue from the atlas without bone). For quantitative evaluation, PET mean activity concentration values were measured in 14 1-mL volumes of interest (VOIs) distributed throughout the brain and statistical significance was tested with a paired t test. Results The mean overall difference (±standard deviation) of PET with ATAC compared with PET with CTAC was -0.69 kBq/mL ± 0.60 (-4.0% ± 3.2) (P < .001). The results were patient dependent (range, -9.3% to 0.57%) and VOI dependent (range, -5.9 to -2.2). In addition, when bone was not included for AC, the overall difference of PET with ATAC (-9.4% ± 3.7) was significantly worse than that of PET with ATAC (-4.0% ± 3.2) (P < .001). Finally, when patient bone was used for AC instead of atlas bone, the overall difference of PET with ATAC (-1.5% ± 1.5) improved over that of PET with ATAC (-4.0% ± 3.2) (P < .001). Conclusion ATAC in PET/MR imaging achieves similar quantification accuracy to that from CTAC by means of atlas-based bone compensation. However, patient-specific anatomic differences from the atlas causes bone attenuation differences and misclassified sinuses, which result in patient-dependent performance variation of ATAC. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Evaluation of Sinus/Edge-Corrected Zero-Echo-Time–Based Attenuation Correction in Brain PET/MRI

“…Interpatient anatomic and bone-density variability played a key role in the performance of each method (24). The ATAC method relied on a single-atlas CT, which could not capture the range of interpatient variability in our subjects.…”

Targeting iron metabolism in high-grade glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR

“…Atlas-based attenuation correction of the PET/MR images has quantification accuracy similar to that obtained from PET/CT. However, there are some inaccuracies around the paranasal sinuses (31), which may affect the PET quantification of lesions within the brain that are adjacent to theses structures. Studies with more esoteric MR sequences for cortical bone attenuation correction such as zero echo time (ZTE) are underway to determine whether these alternate attenuation correction algorithms can resolve this minor challenge.…”

Magnetic Resonance-Based Attenuation Correction and Scatter Correction in Neurological Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging—Current Status With Emerging Applications

“…Evaluations of the template-based method described in the paper of Wollenweber et al [88] have been performed against CTAC [37,143], a multiatlas method [98], and ZTE-based attenuation correction [70]. The ZTE method has also been evaluated against Ge-68 transmission sources [34], in dynamic PET [33], and in MR-based radiotherapy of the head [35].…”