2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008gl036744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative estimate of water yield reduction caused by forestation in a water‐limited area in northwest China

Abstract: [1] The eco-hydrological model SWIM was used to examine the effects of forestation on water yield in a watershed of the Liupan Mountains in northwest China. The results showed that the water yield variation caused by tree species shift among mature forests dominated by larch, poplar and birch was negligible. The vegetation type conversion from grassland to forest strongly reduced water yield. The annual water yield reduction after 10% forestation was 15.8 mm on average with a fluctuation from 3.5 to 19.3 mm. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations showed that ET estimates from forests were higher than for other land cover types (Fig. 7), similar to the findings of previous studies, which reported that conversion from crop and grass to forest can cause annual ET to increase and water yield to decrease (Twine et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2005Sun et al, , 2006Yu et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2011b). Sun et al (2006) indicated that the average water yield reduction caused by land cover conversion varied from ∼ 50 mm yr −1 (50 % of initial) in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of northern China to ∼ 300 mm yr −1 (30 % of initial) in the tropical southern region.…”
Section: Influences Of Land Cover Change On Etsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulations showed that ET estimates from forests were higher than for other land cover types (Fig. 7), similar to the findings of previous studies, which reported that conversion from crop and grass to forest can cause annual ET to increase and water yield to decrease (Twine et al, 2004;Sun et al, 2005Sun et al, , 2006Yu et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2011b). Sun et al (2006) indicated that the average water yield reduction caused by land cover conversion varied from ∼ 50 mm yr −1 (50 % of initial) in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of northern China to ∼ 300 mm yr −1 (30 % of initial) in the tropical southern region.…”
Section: Influences Of Land Cover Change On Etsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Sun et al (2006) indicated that the average water yield reduction caused by land cover conversion varied from ∼ 50 mm yr −1 (50 % of initial) in the semiarid Loess Plateau region of northern China to ∼ 300 mm yr −1 (30 % of initial) in the tropical southern region. According to hydrological model simulations, Yu et al (2009) declared that changing grassland into forest caused a significant reduction of water yield and an increase of ET in a watershed of the Liupan Mountains, northwest China. Based on daily meteorological and gauging stations data, Zhang et al (2011b) found that intensifying urbanization acted towards decreasing ET in the PRB.…”
Section: Influences Of Land Cover Change On Etmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the crop scheduling was adjusted in the warmer climate. However, the SWIM model is able to simulate complex crop rotations and changes in land use patters, as demonstrated in several previous regional studies (Wechsung et al , 2000; Hattermann et al , 2007b; Yu et al , 2009). Therefore, possible changes in land use patterns and crop rotation could be considered in the follow‐up studies to combine them with changes in climate and to explore how changes in land use could compensate for undesirable changes in water flow dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Compared to vegetation type change, the simulation in a small basin by Yu et al . () showed that the tree species shift among mature forests dominated by larch, poplar, and birch (with a maximum LAI of 5.5, 2.4, and 3.9) did not result in a significant difference in water yield change, as observed in other regions of the world (Sahin and Hall, ; Wattenbach et al ., ).…”
Section: Findings In the Forest Structure‐function Relationsmentioning
confidence: 80%