2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography: An Accurate Method for the Differentiation of Solid Pancreatic Masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
213
7
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
213
7
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no consensus where to set reference area for the pancreas instead of fat around the mammary gland for the breast. Some investigators set reference area on non tumorous area inside pancreatic parenchyma [33,34] , and the other investigators set reference area on red area around the pancreas which was estimated as fat [35,36] (Figure 4) . However, there is no evidence if red area around pancreas is really fat.…”
Section: Us-elastography -Shear Wave Elastograhymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is no consensus where to set reference area for the pancreas instead of fat around the mammary gland for the breast. Some investigators set reference area on non tumorous area inside pancreatic parenchyma [33,34] , and the other investigators set reference area on red area around the pancreas which was estimated as fat [35,36] (Figure 4) . However, there is no evidence if red area around pancreas is really fat.…”
Section: Us-elastography -Shear Wave Elastograhymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Itokawa et al [34] subjected 72 ductal adenocar cinomas and 7 tumor forming pancreatitis, and reported that strain ratio was significantly higher in ductal adenocarcinomas compared to that in tumor forming pancreatitis (39.08 ± 20.54 vs 23.66 ± 12.65, P < 0.05). Iglesias Garcia et al [35] subjected 86 pancreatic tumors including 49 ductal adenocarcinomas, 27 tumor forming pancreatitis, 6 endocrine carcinomas, and 2 metastatic carcinomas. They reported when cutoff of strain ratio optimal for distinguishing malignancy from benignancy was determined as 6.04, sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 92.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Eus-elastography -Strain Elastographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,6,11,13,25 Iglesias-Garcia et al 26 demonstrated a 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity of quantitative EUS-E in 86 consecutive patients undergoing EUS evaluation for solid pancreatic masses for differentiating malignancies from benign pancreatic lesions. 13,26 This data was replicated by Opačić et al 27 in a prospective study involving 105 patients with pancreatic masses and 44 controls, with a sensitivity of 98% using the strain ratio. There are however, conflicting results from other studies leading to several high-quality meta-analyses.…”
Section: Eus With Elastographymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A strain ratio of 4.65 and elasticity of 0.27% were the cut-off points for differentiation of pancreatic cancer from inflammatory masses [82]. Higher strain ratios were diagnostic for malignancy with an accuracy of 98% [83,84]. Three recent meta-analyses found sensitivity of 95-99%, specificity of 69-76%, and accuracy of 89-96% [85][86][87].…”
Section: Elastographymentioning
confidence: 99%