2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative elemental analysis of nickel alloys using calibration-based laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of resonance atomic lines is not generally suitable for making calibration lines due to a self-absorption effect: [16][17][18][19][20] emission related to a resonance transition would be predominantly absorbed by the same kind of atom in the ground state, resulting in a decrease in the observed emission intensity. However, under the experimental conditions described above, we had no choice but to use the two resonance lines of copper because of relatively low concentrations of copper in Fe-Cu SRMs as well as severe spectral interferences with a number of iron atomic/ionic emission lines; therefore, emission lines of iron that have a similar excited energy were considered to be favorable for the internal standard method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of resonance atomic lines is not generally suitable for making calibration lines due to a self-absorption effect: [16][17][18][19][20] emission related to a resonance transition would be predominantly absorbed by the same kind of atom in the ground state, resulting in a decrease in the observed emission intensity. However, under the experimental conditions described above, we had no choice but to use the two resonance lines of copper because of relatively low concentrations of copper in Fe-Cu SRMs as well as severe spectral interferences with a number of iron atomic/ionic emission lines; therefore, emission lines of iron that have a similar excited energy were considered to be favorable for the internal standard method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral lines of Mn I and Si I used for analysis are shown in the figure. A calibration curve for Mn present in the samples is prepared from the LIBS spectra of three certified Mn-doped glass samples (samples 1,3 and 4), employing the internal standardization method 28 by considering the analyte Mn atomic line (482.35 nm) and the reference Si atomic line (288.16 nm) as shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Mn In Glass Samples Using Calibrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15) The self-absorption of an analytical line frequently causes reversal in the emission intensity, which leads to a calibration curve having a significant curvature; as a result, the accurate determination is hardly carried out. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Furthermore, it is generally difficult to determine an analyte element at minor concentration ranges, because the plasma is pulsating and thus gives large fluctuations in the emission intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%