2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative effect of Atorvastatin on size and content of non-calcified plaques of coronary arteries 1 year after Atorvastatin treatment by multislice computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a trend toward LDL levels being related to noncalcified plaque but not the calcified portion. CAC scores did not change [13].…”
Section: Recent Noncontrolled Trialsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a trend toward LDL levels being related to noncalcified plaque but not the calcified portion. CAC scores did not change [13].…”
Section: Recent Noncontrolled Trialsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Because it was observational and not placebo controlled, no conclusions can be drawn. Using MDCT technology, Uehara et al [13] evaluated 21 patients with calcified and noncalcified plaque treated with 10 mg/d of atorvastatin. This also was an observational study, with atorvastatin added after a baseline scan and then a followup scan performed after 1 year.…”
Section: Recent Noncontrolled Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting the present finding, Uehara et al have previously demonstrated that 16-slice MDCT was able to non-invasively detect changes in plaque content after atorvastatin treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. 29 In that study, mean CT attenuation value of non-calcified plaque was significantly increased from 55 HU to 62 HU after atorvastatin treatment. And Pflederer et al also reported that, compared between ACS patients and stable angina patients, the mean and minimum CT attenuation value of culprit coronary plaque are significantly lower in ACS patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Lehman et al (26) observed that a number of cardiovascular risk factors and smoking were independently associated with plaque progression. Uehara et al (30) reported that LDL cholesterol level may be an important factor in decreasing non-calcified plaque area. In contrast, Hoffmann et al (31) found that cardiac risk factors have no significant effect on the plaque growth rate, unlike statin dosage which has a direct effect on the growth rate of non-calcified plaque.…”
Section: Association Between Plaque Volume Changes and Cardiovascularmentioning
confidence: 99%