With the research assistance of Christine A. Sinkey, RN Studies of peripheral blood vessels in humans have focused primarily on regulation of blood flow and vascular resistance, which are thought to reflect small vessel caliber. Recent studies in animals have identified flow-mediated and neurogenic changes in large artery diameter. This study tested for flow-mediated dilatation and reflex constriction of the brachial artery in humans. A dual-crystal pulsed Doppler system was used to measure brachial artery diameter and blood flow proximal to the antecubital fossa. To test for flow-mediated dilatation, flow through the brachial artery was altered by an occluding cuff placed on the forearm distal to the site of brachial artery flow and diameter measurement. Control blood flow was 123 +20 mllmin, and brachial artery diameter was 4.74+±0.17 mm (mean+SEM). By inflating the distal occluding cuiT (distal circulatory arrest), flow was reduced through the brachial artery to 21±5 ml/min (p < 0.005), and brachial artery diameter was reduced to 4.35±0.20 mm (p < 0.001). By deflating the distal occluding cufT after 10 minutes (reactive hyperemia), brachial artery flow was increased to 358±55 mlVmin (p<0.001), and diameter was increased to 5.6±0.19 mm (p<0.001). These interventions did not change systemic arterial pressure and, as measured in three subjects, caused only small changes in local brachial artery distending pressure. Thus, both increased and decreased brachial artery blood flow produced significant changes in brachial artery diameter without altering arterial distending pressure. These data provide evidence for flow-mediated dilatation in humans. Reflex constriction was assessed by responses to lower-body negative pressure (-20 mm Hg) and the cold pressor test. Both reflex stimuli significantly (p < 0.001) reduced flow and brachial artery diameter. To determine whether or not these reflex stimuli caused constriction independent of reduced flow, lower-body negative pressure and the cold pressor test were performed during distal circulatory arrest (i.e., when brachial artery flow could not change). The cold pressor test, but not lower-body negative pressure, caused constriction beyond that attained by distal circulatory arrest alone (p<0.005). Thus, brachial artery constriction with the cold pressor test may involve direct sympathetic constriction, but brachial artery constriction during lower-body negative pressure can be explained by reduced flow alone. In summary, this study demonstrates that a tonically active, flow-mediated dilatation occurs independent of changes in distending pressure in a large peripheral artery in humans. Further, reflex stimuli cause constriction of the brachial artery that may involve direct sympathetic constriction or may be secondary to reduced flow. (Circulation 1989;79:93-