Quantitative disease risk scores from EHR with applications to clinical risk stratification and genetic studies

Abstract

Labeling clinical data from electronic health records (EHR) in health systems requires extensive knowledge of human expert, and painstaking review by clinicians. Furthermore, existing phenotyping algorithms are not uniformly applied across large datasets and can suffer from inconsistencies in case definitions across different algorithms. We describe here quantitative disease risk scores based on almost unsupervised methods that require minimal input from clinicians, can be applied to large datasets, and alleviate some of the main weaknesses of existing phenotyping algorithms. We show applications to phenotypic data on approximately 100,000 individuals in eMERGE, and focus on several complex diseases, including Chronic Kidney Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, Heart Failure, and a few others. We demonstrate that relative to existing approaches, the proposed methods have higher prediction accuracy, can better identify phenotypic features relevant to the disease under consideration, can perform better at clinical risk stratification, and can identify undiagnosed cases based on phenotypic features available in the EHR. Using genetic data from the eMERGE-seq panel that includes sequencing data for 109 genes on 21,363 individuals from multiple ethnicities, we also show how the new quantitative disease risk scores help improve the power of genetic association studies relative to the standard use of disease phenotypes. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of quantitative disease risk scores derived from rich phenotypic EHR databases to provide a more meaningful characterization of clinical risk for diseases of interest beyond the prevalent binary (case-control) classification.

An integrated pipeline for prediction of Clostridioides difficile infection

“…The potential interaction between the genetic feature and clinical risk factors beyond age and sex was not recognized and implemented in the genotype simulation, which may prevent the conclusion made from the MyCode sample could fully be extended to the larger nonMyCode sample, leading to more uncertainty of the discriminative power in the model with the simulated genetic feature included. The importance of the genetic feature was ranked lowest in the Logistic Regression-based model, suggesting Logistic Regression may underestimate the contribution of the genetic variant for the prediction of CDI, highlighting the importance of capturing multi-way interactions when assessing the value of common genetic variants with a small effect size in prediction models 25 .…”

Quantitative risk analysis of treatment plans for patients with tumor by mining historical similar patients from electronic health records using federated learning

“…Electronic health records (EHRs) contain a large amount of information including historical patients’ demographics, medical examination results, tumor states, adopted treatments, and treatment outcomes (Y. Li, Fan, et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021). It would be a valuable attempt to estimate the related data in Figure 1 by mining information from EHRs.…”

Findings from the 2022 Yearbook Section on Health Information Exchange

“…When EHRs were initially developed, adopted, deployed and used in healthcare, topics of change management related to moving from paper-based charting to EHRs, EHR adoption, barriers and facilitators of the use of EHRs, best practices for EHR implementation, and healthcare provider receptivity to use of EHRs dominated early research studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. More recently, now that healthcare data are routinely captured in electronic form, there has been an increase in studies related to mining the data in EHRs for use in research and quality improvement, studies of descriptive and predictive data analytic methods to analyze and use the data, and more interest in, and public policy actions requiring, information exchange among healthcare organizations [8][9][10]. Health information exchange as a verb (the process of accessing and sharing a patient's clinical and health information electronically) and as a noun (the organization that is responsible for the oversight of the exchange of information and that provides technology and services to share data) have grown over time.…”