2014
DOI: 10.7731/kifse.2014.28.3.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Difference in the Extinguishing Concentration of Inert Gases with Fire Suppression Criteria in a Cup Burner Test

Abstract: Quantitative differences in the extinguishing concentration with fire suppression criteria (i.e. blow-out or onset of flame instability) were also examined. It was found that the difference in extinguishing concentration was increased with the appearance of lifted flame and the low extinguishing performance of inert gaseous. The maximum difference in extinguishing concentration with the suppression criteria was approximately 35% at the highest fuel velocity condition (1.3 cm/s) for the C 3 H 8 -air nonpremixed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from the figure, the mean CH 4 -N 2 extinguishing concentration obtained in this paper was 25.45% and the mean CH 4 -CO 2 extinguishing concentration was 15.51%. The experimental results are in good agreement with the fire-extinguishing concentrations reported in previous literature, where they differ from the experimental values of Cho et al by 1.9% (25.5%) and 3.4% (15%), respectively; from the experimental values of Takahashi et al by 1.7% (25.9%) and 1.2% (15.7%), respectively; and from the experimental values of Saito et al for CO 2 . The difference was 2.5% (15.9%).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As can be seen from the figure, the mean CH 4 -N 2 extinguishing concentration obtained in this paper was 25.45% and the mean CH 4 -CO 2 extinguishing concentration was 15.51%. The experimental results are in good agreement with the fire-extinguishing concentrations reported in previous literature, where they differ from the experimental values of Cho et al by 1.9% (25.5%) and 3.4% (15%), respectively; from the experimental values of Takahashi et al by 1.7% (25.9%) and 1.2% (15.7%), respectively; and from the experimental values of Saito et al for CO 2 . The difference was 2.5% (15.9%).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%