1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(98)00060-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative determination of the thickness of ferroelectric domain walls using weak beam transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we studied the effect of the gradient energy coefficients on the phase stability diagram using a range of gradient energy coefficients G 11 / G 110 =0.2–0.6. For this range, the calculated domain wall width and domain wall energy for 90° domains in PT lies within the theoretically and experimentally observed domain wall width and domain wall energy 21,27–29 of 5–21 Å and 0.035–0.050 J/m 2 , respectively. We found that the gradient energy coefficient affects only the stability range of the mixture of the orthorhombic and tetragonal a phase, i.e., with the decrease in gradient energy coefficients the stability region of the mixture of orthorhombic and tetragonal a domains shrinks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, we studied the effect of the gradient energy coefficients on the phase stability diagram using a range of gradient energy coefficients G 11 / G 110 =0.2–0.6. For this range, the calculated domain wall width and domain wall energy for 90° domains in PT lies within the theoretically and experimentally observed domain wall width and domain wall energy 21,27–29 of 5–21 Å and 0.035–0.050 J/m 2 , respectively. We found that the gradient energy coefficient affects only the stability range of the mixture of the orthorhombic and tetragonal a phase, i.e., with the decrease in gradient energy coefficients the stability region of the mixture of orthorhombic and tetragonal a domains shrinks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The thickness of the domain wall L is thus defined as t^ or any multiple of it. A reasonable choice for the domain wall thickness, which is in agreement with previous experiments [9], is the value L = 4fj. With these considerations, we are led to make the assumption that the continuous variation of the geometrical phase across the domain wall has to be described by a function that has the same asymptotic behaviour as P\\.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Vj (r) is given by (9) where the m is the rest mass of the electron, Q. is the volume of the unit cell and r n is the position of the atom n in the unit cell. M n = 8n 2 <u 2 > n is the Debye-Waller factor with <u 2 > n being the mean square vibrational amplitude of atom «./ rt ' r ' is the atomic scattering amplitude in the first-order Born approximation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…approximately 4 nm in ferroelectrics [31,32], this would leave unperturbed lattice regions (excluding dislocations) of only about 6 nm essentially within the domain. In this respect the domain wall represents a transition region across which the elastic distortion of the material varies smoothly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%