2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2006.00216.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Determination of <italic>Cucumber Mosaic Virus</italic> Genome RNAs in Virions by Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Abstract: A real-time RT-PCR procedure using the green fluorescent dye SYBR Green I was developed for determining the absolute and relative copies of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) genomic RNAs contained in purified virions. Primers specific to each CMV ORF were designed and selected. Sequences were then amplified with length varying from 61 to 153 bp. Using dilution series of CMV genome RNAs prepared by in vitro transcription as the standard samples, a good linear correlation was observed between their threshold cycle (Ct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no direct investigation has addressed this question, some data indicating unequal accumulation of different genome segments can be found, for example, in studies on cucumber mosaic virus [38][39][40][41] , tomato aspermy virus 42,43 and brome mosaic virus 44 -all positive-sense ssRNA viruses unrelated to FBNSV. These earlier studies were either purely descriptive, analysing the physical and/or chemical properties of the virus particle 38,39,42,44 , or focused on technical developments for RNA quantification 40,41,44 . Nevertheless, they suggest that the regulation of segment copy number may be a general feature of multipartite viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no direct investigation has addressed this question, some data indicating unequal accumulation of different genome segments can be found, for example, in studies on cucumber mosaic virus [38][39][40][41] , tomato aspermy virus 42,43 and brome mosaic virus 44 -all positive-sense ssRNA viruses unrelated to FBNSV. These earlier studies were either purely descriptive, analysing the physical and/or chemical properties of the virus particle 38,39,42,44 , or focused on technical developments for RNA quantification 40,41,44 . Nevertheless, they suggest that the regulation of segment copy number may be a general feature of multipartite viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their stem-loop RT primers, forward primers and reverse primers were designed according to criteria mentioned by Chen et al, (2005) and Tang et al (2006). For target mRNAs, the design of the conventional gene-specific forward and reverse primers was based on sequences obtained from clones of AGO1 and ARF8, or from public databases (MYB: AY131230 and AY131231, SCL: DQ087265), and was optimized as per our previous work (Feng et al, 2006). All sequences are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Primer Design For Real-time Rt-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantitative real-time RT-PCR (SYBR Green) has also been used to determine the quantities of different RNA segments of the CMV genome (Feng et al 2006). These real-time RT-PCR assays have been shown to be more sensitive than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and conventional PCR (Mumford et al 2000(Mumford et al , 2008Feng et al 2006;Pappu et al 2008). These methods require investigation to verify whether they can detect viruses in dormant bulbs reliably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different real-time RT-PCR assays for the detection of IYSV were developed; one using TaqMan probe (Mumford et al 2008) and the other using SYBR Green (Pappu et al 2008). A quantitative real-time RT-PCR (SYBR Green) has also been used to determine the quantities of different RNA segments of the CMV genome (Feng et al 2006). These real-time RT-PCR assays have been shown to be more sensitive than enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and conventional PCR (Mumford et al 2000(Mumford et al , 2008Feng et al 2006;Pappu et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%