2005
DOI: 10.1021/ac051236u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Detection System for Maize Sample Containing Combined-Trait Genetically Modified Maize

Abstract: Various countries have established regulations that stipulate the labeling of agricultural commodities, feed, and food products that contain or are made from genetically modified (GM) material or that contain adventitious GM material in amounts that exceed certain threshold levels. While regulations in some countries refer to GM material on a weight per weight (w/w) percentage, the currently applied detection methods do not directly measure the w/w percentage of the GM material. Depending on the particular met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the preparation of simulated samples, DNA concentration was measured with PicoGreen dsDNA reagent, which is a sensitive fluorescent nucleic acid stain for quantitating double-stranded DNA and can eliminate the e#ects caused by single-stranded nucleic acids and other impurities. Referring to previous reports῎ 10, ῎ 11 , twenty-one independent multiplex PCR runs were performed for each kind of simulated sample, and the results were analyzed statistically ( Table 2). According to the ISO standard for GMO analysis methods on foodstu#s῎ 12 , the LOD value was defined as the lowest level of analytes with the false negative rate of 5῍ or less in multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.…”
Section: Examination Of Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the preparation of simulated samples, DNA concentration was measured with PicoGreen dsDNA reagent, which is a sensitive fluorescent nucleic acid stain for quantitating double-stranded DNA and can eliminate the e#ects caused by single-stranded nucleic acids and other impurities. Referring to previous reports῎ 10, ῎ 11 , twenty-one independent multiplex PCR runs were performed for each kind of simulated sample, and the results were analyzed statistically ( Table 2). According to the ISO standard for GMO analysis methods on foodstu#s῎ 12 , the LOD value was defined as the lowest level of analytes with the false negative rate of 5῍ or less in multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.…”
Section: Examination Of Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detection of GM maize in foods and food materials, PCR-based detection methods, which are able to detect even small amounts of transgenes in raw materials and processed foods, have been routinely used. We have also developed simplex and multiplex qualitative PCR methods 2)ῌ7) , simplex real-time PCR methods 8), 9) and an individual kernel-based detection method including a qualitative multiplex real-time PCR 10), ῎ 5 . Some of these methods have been employed as o$cial analytical methods in Japan῎ 6, ῎ 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSIIb-3 system (SSIIb 3῍5῎ and SSIIb 3῍3῎ with SSIIb-Taq) was used for real-time PCR detection of the taxon specific gene encoding the maize starch synthase IIb gene sequence (SSIIb) as described previously 17), 18) .…”
Section: Real-time Pcr Assay Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also developed simplex and multiplex qualitative PCR methods 6)ῌ11) , simplex real-time PCR methods 12), 13) , and an individual kernel-based detection method including a qualitative multiplex real-time PCR 14) . In particular, six real-time PCR methods for five events of GM maize, i.e., Bt11, Bt176, GA21, MON810, and T25, and a Roundup Ready soy, were fully validated by an international interlaboratory collaborative study 12), 15) , and have been not only employed as Japanese o$cial analytical methods῏ 3, ῏ 4 , but also internationally recognized as ISO standard methods for the analysis of GMOs in foodstu#s῏ 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%