2016
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201608.0084.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative detection of trace malachite green in aquiculture water samples by extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Abstract: Exposure to malachite green (MG) may pose great health risks to humans; thus, it is of prime importance to develop fast and robust methods to quantitatively screen the presence of malachite green in water. Herein the application of extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS) has been extended to the trace detection of MG within lake water and aquiculture water, due to the intensive use of MG as a biocide in fisheries. This method has the advantage of obviating offline liquid-liquid extractio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now there have been a few published methods for determination of dyes in water samples allowing the detection and quantification of dyes at the concentration level below 1 μg/l. LOQ for MG (0.01 μg/l) in the presented method is lower than LOQ obtained with methods developed by Mitrowska [ 21 ] (0.04 μg/l), Khan [ 12 ] (0.1 μg//l), Zhang [ 7 ] (0.25 μg/l), Fang [ 35 ] (0.5 μg/l) and Ghasemi [ 23 ] (13.6 μg/l). LOQ of another triphenylmethane dye, CV (0.01 μg/l) allows the determination of the dye at lower concentration than LOQ obtained with other authors' methods: Zhang [ 7 ] (0.25 μg/l), Šafařík [ 34 ] (0.5 μg/l), Sadeghi [ 27 ] (4.7 μg/l), An [ 19 ] (16 μg/l), Ghasemi [ 23 ] (17.6 μg/l), Aydin [ 20 ], Yu [ 16 ] (32 μg/l).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Until now there have been a few published methods for determination of dyes in water samples allowing the detection and quantification of dyes at the concentration level below 1 μg/l. LOQ for MG (0.01 μg/l) in the presented method is lower than LOQ obtained with methods developed by Mitrowska [ 21 ] (0.04 μg/l), Khan [ 12 ] (0.1 μg//l), Zhang [ 7 ] (0.25 μg/l), Fang [ 35 ] (0.5 μg/l) and Ghasemi [ 23 ] (13.6 μg/l). LOQ of another triphenylmethane dye, CV (0.01 μg/l) allows the determination of the dye at lower concentration than LOQ obtained with other authors' methods: Zhang [ 7 ] (0.25 μg/l), Šafařík [ 34 ] (0.5 μg/l), Sadeghi [ 27 ] (4.7 μg/l), An [ 19 ] (16 μg/l), Ghasemi [ 23 ] (17.6 μg/l), Aydin [ 20 ], Yu [ 16 ] (32 μg/l).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Tests with authentic standards show that the EESI-TOF can quantify target inorganic and organic analytes present in complex sample matrices (Fang et al, 2016;Giannoukos et al, 2020;Lopez-Hilfiker et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2013). However, the relative ionization efficiencies (RIEs) of EESI or ESI (where the analyte is directly infused into the ES solution) towards different compounds could vary by orders of magnitude depending on the instrument setting, sample matrices, electrospray solutions, and other experimental conditions (Kruve et al, 2013;Liigand et al, 2018;Kruve et al, 2014;Oss et al, 2010;Mayhew et al, 2020;Lopez-Hilfiker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%