2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.07.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA with the novel artus® HBV QS-RGQ Kit version 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As studied before, there are several possible factors that may lead to assay discrepancies [10,20,21]. It has been reported that the HBV genotype B and low HBV viral load were 2 factors that contribute to significant differences in HBV DNA viral load detection, that is, ≥1/2 log 10 IU/mL, when compared to the real-time HBV assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) with CAP/ CTM v2.0 assay [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As studied before, there are several possible factors that may lead to assay discrepancies [10,20,21]. It has been reported that the HBV genotype B and low HBV viral load were 2 factors that contribute to significant differences in HBV DNA viral load detection, that is, ≥1/2 log 10 IU/mL, when compared to the real-time HBV assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) with CAP/ CTM v2.0 assay [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newly launched artus QS-RGQ assay suggested a lower LOD, higher sample volume, and higher LOQ than CAP/CTM v2.0 assay by manufacturer. This new assay has not been researched enough about its performance, except for two abstracts with plasma samples [ 11 12 ]. Brichler et al [ 11 ] reported good correlation and agreement (r 2 =0.89, mean difference=0.1 log 10 IU/mL) between the new assay and CAP/CTM v2.0 assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 23% of the 230 samples showed more than ±0.5 log 10 IU/mL difference range, and the HBV DNA levels by the artus QS-RGQ assay were lower than the results by the CAP/CTM v2.0 assay in their study ( P value is not shown). Fielder et al [ 12 ] suggested that new assay showed detection capability of all eight genotypes, no cross-reactivity with 30 different pathogens and low LOD of 4.1 IU/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation