2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative detection of apple watercore and soluble solids content by near infrared transmittance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SSC prediction performance of the system was = 0.861, RMSEP = 0.403 °Brix, by using the optimal MLR model with the five effective wavebands at 900, 760, 730, 680, and 535 nm. The SSC prediction performance was comparable to that of previous studies on apples with dispersive spectrometers when considering both and RMSEP [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The appropriateness of selected wavebands was confirmed not only by corresponding absorbance origins but also because they have been utilized in many previous studies for evaluating the SSC or sugar content of fruits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The SSC prediction performance of the system was = 0.861, RMSEP = 0.403 °Brix, by using the optimal MLR model with the five effective wavebands at 900, 760, 730, 680, and 535 nm. The SSC prediction performance was comparable to that of previous studies on apples with dispersive spectrometers when considering both and RMSEP [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The appropriateness of selected wavebands was confirmed not only by corresponding absorbance origins but also because they have been utilized in many previous studies for evaluating the SSC or sugar content of fruits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The specific implementation steps are briefly described as follows: based on interval PLS, the sub-intervals of several local models with higher accuracy in the same interval division are combined, and the RMSEC value is the joint model measurement index, selected from all models the best joint sub-interval (RMSEC is the smallest). The PLS model based on the best joint subinterval has the strongest predictive ability [30]. The electronic nose data has a large amount of information, and it is easy to introduce too much useless data during the modeling process, which reduces the prediction accuracy of the model, and the data interval needs to be filtered.…”
Section: Synergy Interval Partial Least Squarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the spectra accurately requires a large amount of data that can slow down the process and limit practical use of the instrument. Guo et al [111] developed a theoretical basis for the industrial application of NIR spectroscopy for the determination of apple SSC by using a variable selection method. They showed that competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) can simplify modeling and that competitive adaptive reweighted sampling-partial least squares (CARS-PLS) modeling can have practical applications in an industry setting.…”
Section: Fruitsmentioning
confidence: 99%