2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative depth distribution analysis of elements in high alloy steel using MCs+-SIMS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A field aperture of 400 µm diameter was selected at the centre of the raster area in order to remove crater edge effects, which provided an analysis region of diameter ~33 µm. The analyses were carried out using MCs + secondary ion detection mode (M being the element of interest), in order to effectively reduce the matrix effects especially in the mixed layers [34]. Pressure in the analysis chamber was maintained at ~9 × 10 − 9 mbar and mass resolution (m/dm) of ~400 was used to reduce isobaric mass interferences, arising from the sample or from background gases present in the analysis chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A field aperture of 400 µm diameter was selected at the centre of the raster area in order to remove crater edge effects, which provided an analysis region of diameter ~33 µm. The analyses were carried out using MCs + secondary ion detection mode (M being the element of interest), in order to effectively reduce the matrix effects especially in the mixed layers [34]. Pressure in the analysis chamber was maintained at ~9 × 10 − 9 mbar and mass resolution (m/dm) of ~400 was used to reduce isobaric mass interferences, arising from the sample or from background gases present in the analysis chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 The SIMS analysis was performed for elemental chemical determination at the surface and, as the primary objective of this research, with the objective of developing a quantitative method for this technique through the depth profiles of ion-implanted samples. For all the samples studied, 16 O and 52 Cr were the ions selected for monitoring F I G U R E 1 Image of the sample holder with the ion beam impinging the selected irradiation area. It shows the arrangement of the target substrates during both implantations.…”
Section: Characterization and Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nuclear fusion, the quantitative analysis, that is, the determination of impurities and composition of alloys in structural steels and first wall tungsten-based materials, [14][15][16][17] has also been investigated by SIMS, although the literature is scarce. In this sense, chromium is a fascinating element to quantify in these types of matrices since its presence plays a fundamental role for their mechanical, structural, and functional properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, RSF values are also utilized to determine the mean concentration of elements present in a particular matrix. 17 The RSF value of an element is always specific for a particular matrix under identical experimental conditions. Hence, to calculate the RSF value of an element in a particular matrix, a reference sample with a known concentration of the element and a similar matrix is required.…”
Section: Rsfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSF of an element is used to convert the secondary ion intensity to concentration of the element in a SIMS depth profile analysis. In addition, RSF values are also utilized to determine the mean concentration of elements present in a particular matrix 17 . The RSF value of an element is always specific for a particular matrix under identical experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%