1950
DOI: 10.1002/cne.900930103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative data on the size of synaptic end‐bulbs in the cat's spinal cord. With a note on the preparation of cell models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1952
1952
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synaptic boutons on motoneurones abundantly cover the surface of motoneurones (Hagger & Barr, 1950), and, as a consequence, if neurotransmitters from single quanta saturate postsynaptic receptors (Tang et al, 1994), then transmitter could diffuse to neighbouring synapses (Barbour et al, 1994). Thus it is possible that glycine diffuses from its synapse to nearby glutamatergic synapses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synaptic boutons on motoneurones abundantly cover the surface of motoneurones (Hagger & Barr, 1950), and, as a consequence, if neurotransmitters from single quanta saturate postsynaptic receptors (Tang et al, 1994), then transmitter could diffuse to neighbouring synapses (Barbour et al, 1994). Thus it is possible that glycine diffuses from its synapse to nearby glutamatergic synapses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggestive evidence for this notion has been provided recently by the high m values of monosynaptic EPSPs recorded from neurones in Clarke's column (Eide, Fedina, Jansen, Lundberg & Vyklick'Y, 1967;Kuno & Miyahara, 1968a), which coincides with the presence of giant synaptic contacts on these neurones (Szentagothai & Albert, 1955). In this respect, it is rather surprising that the m value of EPSPs in spinal motoneurones shows such wide variation, since the presynaptic terminals on the motoneurone are relatively uniform in size (Haggar & Barr, 1950;Wyckoff & Young, 1956;Illis, 1964;Gelfan & iRapisarda, 1964). It is suggested that the variation of the m value is due to the difference in the number of afferent terminal branchings on a motoneurone (also, see Kuno, 1964a;Burke & Nelson, 1966).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been shown that m values of the monosynaptic response observed in Clarke's column neurones are significantly greater than those measured in spinal motoneurones (Kuno & Miyahara, 1969;Eide, Fedina, Jansen, Lundberg & Vyklicky, 1969). A substantial number of synaptic endings on Clarke's column neurones are 5-15 # in diameter (Szentagothai & Albert, 1955), whereas those on spinal motoneurones usually range from 0-5 to 3 ,t (Haggar & Barr, 1950). Thus, these observations are compatible with the notion that the number of quanta of transmitter released by a nerve impulse may be related to the size of the presynaptic terminals (see also Miledi, 1967;R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%