2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.878144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative CT imaging for adipose tissue analysis in mouse model of obesity

Abstract: In obese humans CT imaging is a validated method for follow up studies of adipose tissue distribution and quantification of visceral and subcutaneous fat. Equivalent methods in murine models of obesity are still lacking. Current small animal micro-CT involves long-term X-ray exposure precluding longitudinal studies. We have overcome this limitation by using a human medical CT which allows very fast 3D imaging (2 sec) and minimal radiation exposure. This work presents novel methods fitted to in vivo investigati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These algorithms are based on edge detection and mathematical operations that identify the body surface, perform a preliminary separation between visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue, and then, after automatic correction, achieve an accurate separation between adipose deposits, eliminating the need for manually drawing contour lines (Hildebrandt et al 2002;Judex et al 2010;Marchadiera et al 2011). These methods are reliable in the determination of whole body fat content and distribution (Kvist et al 1988;Seidell et al 1990); however, adipose tissue is recognized only as the darkest region among brighter areas of muscle and bone, which affords little structural detail (Judex et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms are based on edge detection and mathematical operations that identify the body surface, perform a preliminary separation between visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue, and then, after automatic correction, achieve an accurate separation between adipose deposits, eliminating the need for manually drawing contour lines (Hildebrandt et al 2002;Judex et al 2010;Marchadiera et al 2011). These methods are reliable in the determination of whole body fat content and distribution (Kvist et al 1988;Seidell et al 1990); however, adipose tissue is recognized only as the darkest region among brighter areas of muscle and bone, which affords little structural detail (Judex et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse models of obesity are highly prevalent and provide a convenient experimental system with which to study progression of the disease [29]. Fortunately, adipose is one of the few soft tissues that is readily distinguishable in non-contrast enhanced CT images due to the significantly lower material density of fat in relation to other soft tissues [30]. Thus, CT is an excellent modality to conduct longitudinal studies examining the genetic and environmental factors contributing to fat gain or loss using mouse models.…”
Section: Native Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wall is beneath the subcutaneous fat, which is visible in any given trans-axial slice; thus, evolving the wall along the slice stack will result in enclosed VAT area. Edge-based [5], [12], [13] and region-based [6] active contour models fit in well to achieve this goal. However, the contour-based walltracking approaches for VAT/SAT separation tend to suffer from weak boundary as well as edge leakage problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The past ten years have seen the development of a number of automatic VAT/SAT separation algorithms [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], which usually involve two major analysis tasks. The first step is adipose extraction, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation