1953
DOI: 10.1021/ja01097a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
188
0
3

Year Published

1972
1972
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
188
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…are some of the most potent mutagens in mammalian and microbial cells. They are S N l-type monofunctional alkylating agents with a low Swain-Scott substrate constant (s) (Swain and Scott 1953) and these agents have high reactivity towards centers of low nucleophilicity such as oxygen atom sites in DNA, while S N 2-type reagents such as EMS and dimethyl sulfate, have a higher s value than S N 1 reagents and primarily attack sites of high nucleophilicity, such as ring nitrogen atom sites in DNA; they cause little alkylation at the oxygen atom sites (Neale 1976). Mutations by S N 2 reagents are induced via the error-prone pathway depend on repair system, whereas S N 1 agents are capable to induce mutations independently from error-prone repair (Neale 1976).…”
Section: Chemical Properties Of Nitroso Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are some of the most potent mutagens in mammalian and microbial cells. They are S N l-type monofunctional alkylating agents with a low Swain-Scott substrate constant (s) (Swain and Scott 1953) and these agents have high reactivity towards centers of low nucleophilicity such as oxygen atom sites in DNA, while S N 2-type reagents such as EMS and dimethyl sulfate, have a higher s value than S N 1 reagents and primarily attack sites of high nucleophilicity, such as ring nitrogen atom sites in DNA; they cause little alkylation at the oxygen atom sites (Neale 1976). Mutations by S N 2 reagents are induced via the error-prone pathway depend on repair system, whereas S N 1 agents are capable to induce mutations independently from error-prone repair (Neale 1976).…”
Section: Chemical Properties Of Nitroso Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a comparision of the hydrolysis rates (k 3 ) demonstrated that the H300N mutant was destabilized in the transition state of alkylenzyme hydrolysis by 29 kJ · mol −1 when compared with the wild-type enzyme ( Table 4). The rate decrease can be explained by an anticipated shift in reacting nucleophile from hydroxyl ion to water, which is several orders of magnitude less nucleophilic in carbonyl reactions when compared with the hydroxyl ion [37]. In addition, the positive charge of a protonated imidazole is expected to stabilize a formed hydroxyl ion as well as a negatively charged transition state within the apolar environment of the enzyme active site.…”
Section: Function Of His 300mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkylating agents can be classified as monofunctional or bifunctional (i.e., single or double reactive groups), and they are electrophilic; thus, they react with electron-rich nucleophilic centers within DNA and proteins, with their specific targets depending upon the reactivity of the individual chemicals. The Swain Scott constant (s value) is used as a standard measure of the reactivity of alkylating agents (12). Compounds with high s values target highly nucleophilic centers (e.g., N 7 -G, N 3 -A), whereas low-s value alkylating agents are less sensitive to the level of nucleophilicity of their target; thus, they do not discriminate between centers of high and low nucleophilicity and so are able to alkylate O atoms (e.g., O…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%