Mudflat Ecology 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99194-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Considerations in Mudflat Ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of inviable oocytes in spawns was considerable; for the cockle C. edule on three sampling dates in 2019 and 2021, the mean percentage of inviable oocytes was 70, 85, and 35 (Table 1). Despite the difficulty of spawning induction in field‐collected animals, and hence the relatively low number of spawns reported here, the effect size is quite large (35%–85% inviable oocytes); for a discussion of effect size and replication in mudflat ecology, see Beninger and Boldina (2018). Furthermore, the convergent data from previous prespawning quantitative histological observations (Table 2) support the inviable oocyte results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The proportion of inviable oocytes in spawns was considerable; for the cockle C. edule on three sampling dates in 2019 and 2021, the mean percentage of inviable oocytes was 70, 85, and 35 (Table 1). Despite the difficulty of spawning induction in field‐collected animals, and hence the relatively low number of spawns reported here, the effect size is quite large (35%–85% inviable oocytes); for a discussion of effect size and replication in mudflat ecology, see Beninger and Boldina (2018). Furthermore, the convergent data from previous prespawning quantitative histological observations (Table 2) support the inviable oocyte results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Whether the shorebirds are seeking PUFA and/or some other critical biofilm substance for their final migration stages prior to breeding, the research priority is not only to identify such, but also to understand microphytobenthic spatial and temporal distribution and dynamics, in relation to shorebird demand and ultimate breeding success. However, true spatial analysis on mudflats is still very much in its infancy at present, so development of more efficient sampling and statistical techniques is an urgent research need (Beninger and Boldina 2018). Further, a coherent picture of the overall role of this food resource in shorebird physiology also necessitates analysis of associated risks and costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%