Quantitative Comparisons to Promote Inquiry in the Introductory Physics Lab

Abstract

In a recent report, the American Association of Physics Teachers has developed an updated set of recommendations for curriculum of undergraduate physics labs. This document focuses on six major themes: constructing knowledge, modeling, designing experiments, developing technical and practical laboratory skills, analyzing and visualizing data, and communicating physics. These themes all tie together as a set of practical skills in scientific measurement, analysis, and experimentation. In addition to teaching students how to use these skills, it is important for students to know when to use them so that they can use them autonomously. This requires, especially in the case of analytical skills, high levels of inquiry behaviors to reflect on data and iterate measurements, which students rarely do in lab experiments. Often, they perform lab experiments in a plug-and-chug frame, procedurally completing each activity with little to no sensemaking. An emphasis on obtaining true theoretical values or agreement on individual measurements also reinforces inauthentic behaviors such as retroactively inflating measurement uncertainties. This paper aims to offer a relatively simple pedagogical framework for engaging students authentically in experimentation and inquiry in physics labs.

Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the physics lab inventory of critical thinking

“…Students' written responses also revealed significant conceptual difficulties about measurement uncertainty, consistent with other work [46][47][48]. The first question on the draft instrument asked students to list the possible sources of uncertainty in the measurements of the period of oscillation.…”

Introductory physics labs: We can do better

“…8 They must make many experimental decisions, such as how many repeated trials to take and how many times to let the pendulum swing for each measurement. Most often, students' initial investigations appear to confirm the prediction from the lecture class or textbook: The period does not depend on the amplitude.…”

Surprise! Shifting students away from model-verifying frames in physics labs

“…The lab is intended to teach students about iterating to improve measurements and using statistical tools to evaluate data and inform experimentation decisions. During the first week, through a series of invention tasks [9], students developed a statistic to compare the distinguishability of two measurements within units of uncertainty, referred to as t ′ [6]. They were provided with guidelines: Distinguishable measurements During the second week, students began comparing the period of a pendulum at 10 • and 20 • and iterated to improve measurements.…”