2012
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.2963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparisons of the state‐of‐the‐art data center architectures

Abstract: SUMMARY Data centers are experiencing a remarkable growth in the number of interconnected servers. Being one of the foremost data center design concerns, network infrastructure plays a pivotal role in the initial capital investment and ascertaining the performance parameters for the data center. Legacy data center network (DCN) infrastructure lacks the inherent capability to meet the data centers growth trend and aggregate bandwidth demands. Deployment of even the highest‐end enterprise network equipment only … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The legacy DCN infrastructure inherently lacks the capability to meet the current growth trend and bandwidth demands. The legacy DCN architectures mainly suffer from: (a) energy-inefficiency, (b) poor scalability, (c) high cost, (d) low cross-section bandwidth, and (e) non-agility [6]. Many new DCN architectures, such as the fat-tree, DCell, VL2, BCube, flattened butterfly, and FiConn are proposed in response to the limitations posed by the legacy DCN architectures [6].…”
Section: Dcn Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The legacy DCN infrastructure inherently lacks the capability to meet the current growth trend and bandwidth demands. The legacy DCN architectures mainly suffer from: (a) energy-inefficiency, (b) poor scalability, (c) high cost, (d) low cross-section bandwidth, and (e) non-agility [6]. Many new DCN architectures, such as the fat-tree, DCell, VL2, BCube, flattened butterfly, and FiConn are proposed in response to the limitations posed by the legacy DCN architectures [6].…”
Section: Dcn Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legacy DCN architectures mainly suffer from: (a) energy-inefficiency, (b) poor scalability, (c) high cost, (d) low cross-section bandwidth, and (e) non-agility [6]. Many new DCN architectures, such as the fat-tree, DCell, VL2, BCube, flattened butterfly, and FiConn are proposed in response to the limitations posed by the legacy DCN architectures [6]. Moreover, various hybrid DCN architectures using amalgamation of optical and wireless technologies have been proposed in recent years [14].…”
Section: Dcn Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations