2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18041283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Comparison of Protein Adsorption and Conformational Changes on Dielectric-Coated Nanoplasmonic Sensing Arrays

Abstract: Nanoplasmonic sensors are a popular, surface-sensitive measurement tool to investigate biomacromolecular interactions at solid-liquid interfaces, opening the door to a wide range of applications. In addition to high surface sensitivity, nanoplasmonic sensors have versatile surface chemistry options as plasmonic metal nanoparticles can be coated with thin dielectric layers. Within this scope, nanoplasmonic sensors have demonstrated promise for tracking protein adsorption and substrate-induced conformational cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the LSPR technique is not only sensitive to protein adsorption uptake but is also sensitive to the extent of adsorption-related deformation of the protein molecules on the sensor surface. [55][56][57] pBSA shows a slightly higher optical extinction peak shi (Dl) than pHSA, i.e. the reverse of the DF shis observed in QCM-D (Fig.…”
Section: Lsprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the LSPR technique is not only sensitive to protein adsorption uptake but is also sensitive to the extent of adsorption-related deformation of the protein molecules on the sensor surface. [55][56][57] pBSA shows a slightly higher optical extinction peak shi (Dl) than pHSA, i.e. the reverse of the DF shis observed in QCM-D (Fig.…”
Section: Lsprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the protein are related to its primary structure, specifically the sequence of amino acids and functional groups available for bonding. The variety of chemical residues cause the protein to interact differently with the groups on the surface [66,67,68] (Figure 4).…”
Section: Understanding Protein Adsorption On Solid Surfaces To Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final wavelength shift of the dip 1 position is in good agreement with absolute values observed in our previous work, whereby the adsorption of bovine or human serum albumin onto Si or TiO 2 surfaces led to LSPR peak shifts in the range 0.50-1.5 nm. 44,59 However, similar to DOPC lipid vesicle adsorption, the shift in the position of dip 1 resulting from BSA adsorption was relatively low when normalized to the bulk RI sensitivity. To determine whether this smaller shift was due to lower amounts of BSA adsorbed on indium oxide Au nanoribbon arrays or to differences in surface sensitivity, we extracted the time-resolved wavelength shifts for peak 2 during BSA adsorption ( Figure S6b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To investigate this mismatch further, we characterized adsorption of a protein biomolecule, BSA, which is widely employed in a variety of applications, often as a blocking agent to prevent nonspecific adsorption on sensor surfaces. [60][61][62][63] Recent efforts have relied on nanoplasmonic sensing strategies to quantify the adsorption of serum albumin on various surfaces for understanding adsorptive processes, 40,44,59 as well as for investigating protein corona formation. [64][65][66][67] After obtaining baseline signals in Tris buffer, 100 μM BSA in Tris buffer was introduced at a flow rate of 100 μL/min and adsorption was monitored as a function of time on three different substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%