Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe 2000
DOI: 10.1145/343647.343688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparison of power management algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we briefly describe a power consumption model for disk drives based on the studies [5], [17] (see also the paper [2] for a survey of modeling techniques), and fix the model parameters that we used in our evaluations.…”
Section: Modeling Power Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we briefly describe a power consumption model for disk drives based on the studies [5], [17] (see also the paper [2] for a survey of modeling techniques), and fix the model parameters that we used in our evaluations.…”
Section: Modeling Power Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) ACPI-Based DPM Implementations: A set of experiments were carried out by Lu et al [35], [36] to measure the effectiveness of different DPM policies. Lu used two ACPI-compliant computers, running a beta version of Windows NT V5, which is also ACPI compliant.…”
Section: B System-level Power Management Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results are reported in [36], where a comparative analysis of different algorithms is presented. For comparison purposes, both computers execute the same trace of input data (an 11-h-long execution trace).…”
Section: B System-level Power Management Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], one can find a quantitative comparison between various existing management strategies. Previous work on prediction based dynamic power management can be categorized into two groups: adaptive and non-adaptive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%