2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparison of chipping- and hydrodemolition-induced microscopic damage evolution in concrete substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is rather difficult to use mechanisms (hydraulic hammers) due to work conditions (up to 18-22 m high vertical surfaces), and the necessity to minimize impact loads on concrete. To do the work, scaffolding is erected in a pumped out lock chamber to the whole wall height, and concrete is demolished in tiers [4,5]. Around the installed scaffolding, to their total height, a transparent enclosure (pavilion) is erected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rather difficult to use mechanisms (hydraulic hammers) due to work conditions (up to 18-22 m high vertical surfaces), and the necessity to minimize impact loads on concrete. To do the work, scaffolding is erected in a pumped out lock chamber to the whole wall height, and concrete is demolished in tiers [4,5]. Around the installed scaffolding, to their total height, a transparent enclosure (pavilion) is erected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%