2007 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2007.230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Comparison of Agile Modulation Techniques for Cognitive Radio Transceivers

Abstract: In this paper, we present a quantitative comparison of two agile modulation techniques employed by cognitive radio transceivers operating in a dynamic spectrum access (DSA) network. One of the modulation technique is non-contiguous orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (NC-OFDM), which is designed to avoid interference with the transmissions of incumbent users by deactivating subcarriers within their vicinity. The other modulation technique under study is a variant of multicarrier code division multiple a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a CR network, interference between MC-CDMA based secondary users and primary users can be avoided by using the subcarrier deactivation technique, similar to Non-Contiguous OFDM (NC-OFDM) and such schemes are called Non-Contiguous MC-CDMA (NC-MC-CDMA). Rajbanshi et al [47] investigated the performance of NC-OFDM and NC-MC-CDMA techniques for CR transceivers and made the following conclusions. With respect to PAPR, NC-OFDM exhibits the same problem as the conventional OFDM, while in MC-CDMA PAPR is reduced through frequency domain spreading.…”
Section: Mc-cdmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a CR network, interference between MC-CDMA based secondary users and primary users can be avoided by using the subcarrier deactivation technique, similar to Non-Contiguous OFDM (NC-OFDM) and such schemes are called Non-Contiguous MC-CDMA (NC-MC-CDMA). Rajbanshi et al [47] investigated the performance of NC-OFDM and NC-MC-CDMA techniques for CR transceivers and made the following conclusions. With respect to PAPR, NC-OFDM exhibits the same problem as the conventional OFDM, while in MC-CDMA PAPR is reduced through frequency domain spreading.…”
Section: Mc-cdmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logical channel is treated as if it were a single channel whose capacity is equal to the sum of all licensed channels merged into it. This can be done by using the OFDM technique with selective allocation of subcarriers to the channels to be utilized [12], [13], [14]. In this way, more than one (possibly nonadjacent) channel in the logical channel can be simultaneously utilized by a single SU.…”
Section: Opportunity-usage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) technique with adaptive and selective allocation of OFDM subcarriers to utilize any subset of N licensed channels at the same time [12], [13], [14]. Note that equipping each SU with more than one antenna might cause severe interference among its antennas, thus degrading the SU's performance [15].…”
Section: Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the pool of idle channels is treated as one logical channel, whose capacity is equal to m Á C bandwidth-units. This can be realized by the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) techniques with adaptive and selective allocation of OFDM subcarriers, like Noncontiguous OFDM (NC-OFDM) proposed in [19].…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%