2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-020-0217-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparison between volume-of-fluid and two-fluid models for two-phase flow simulation using OpenFOAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A two-fluid model is mostly used to simulate dispersed flows. It permits multiple bubbles or droplets in a grid; hence, it can predict bubbly flows with a small number of grids [15]. The continuous Eulerian phases are treated as dispersed systems, and each phase has its own density and viscosity properties.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-fluid model is mostly used to simulate dispersed flows. It permits multiple bubbles or droplets in a grid; hence, it can predict bubbly flows with a small number of grids [15]. The continuous Eulerian phases are treated as dispersed systems, and each phase has its own density and viscosity properties.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results may only be applicable in some special cases, as the simulated tuyere diameters and injection speed are not widely used, and the adopted numerical setup such as VOF and Eulerian models do not always perform well in the simulation of bubble behavior. [11] Currently, the reported CFD modeling work of the SKS furnace is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the copper industry, as the furnace structure parameters vary slightly in different copper production companies, [12] resulting in very different furnace parameters being used in various research studies. Therefore, for this newly adapted technology, continuous modeling work is still necessary for different types of furnace structure and tuyere arrangements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%