1995
DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(95)91371-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative comparison between noise reduction factors of drainage asphalt pavement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NRC s for the mixtures reinforced with 1% PP fibers, for example, were 42.6% and 38.95% in the pumping and gravity procedures, respectively, which indicates the higher sound absorption properties of the reinforced specimens as compared to those of plain mixes with NRC values of 10.8% and 9.5%. The reinforced PAFRC mixes’ superior sound absorption ability could be due to the matrix’s linked fibers reflecting sound inside the voids [ 27 , 29 ]. The continuous dispersion and bridging actions of PP fibers are well seen in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NRC s for the mixtures reinforced with 1% PP fibers, for example, were 42.6% and 38.95% in the pumping and gravity procedures, respectively, which indicates the higher sound absorption properties of the reinforced specimens as compared to those of plain mixes with NRC values of 10.8% and 9.5%. The reinforced PAFRC mixes’ superior sound absorption ability could be due to the matrix’s linked fibers reflecting sound inside the voids [ 27 , 29 ]. The continuous dispersion and bridging actions of PP fibers are well seen in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the material’s cavities absorbed the sound energy over inner friction. Moreover, the noise reduction values of pervious and standard asphalt pavements were compared by Meiarashi et al [ 27 ]. They discovered that pervious asphalt reduced noise by 2–5 dB and concluded that keeping the pavement’s porosity at about 20% or greater was critical for noise reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-noise pavements (LNPs) are an interesting and economical solution when traffic noise reduction is necessary. Rolling noise emissions for cars are already predominant at very low speeds (30 to 40 km/h), and source-related noise abatement measures are generally much more expensive than propagation measures (1).…”
Section: Mixture Design Optimization Of Low-noise Pavementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 summarizes the laboratory sample binder information to help clarify the distinctions between samples in Table 1. A design speed of 50 km/h was chosen for the CPXL calculations because generation of tire-road noise is dominated by traffic noise at speeds higher than 50 km/h, but tire-pavement interaction dominates the generation of tire-road noise below 50 km/h (6). CPXL values at a speed of 50 km/h were calculated by using Equation 3.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%