2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative chemical-shift MR imaging cutoff value: Benign versus malignant vertebral compression – Initial experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistically, we defined the optimal SI ratio cut off value for separating benign and malignant vertebral compression as 0.96 with a calculated sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 86%. Our results were in concordance with a study conducted by Zidan et al that defined cut off value as 0.91 and very close to studies carried out by Erly et al and Ogura et al (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistically, we defined the optimal SI ratio cut off value for separating benign and malignant vertebral compression as 0.96 with a calculated sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 86%. Our results were in concordance with a study conducted by Zidan et al that defined cut off value as 0.91 and very close to studies carried out by Erly et al and Ogura et al (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Whereas, no overlap was found in malignant ones. False positive results were defined as fatty infiltration due to previous radiotherapy or marrow fibrosis in other studies, but our patients did not have both conditions (11). False negative results were defined as sclerotic metastasis with evident susceptibility and possible fat containing metastasis are also rare (11,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A previous study [33] showed that there was a significant difference (p < 0.001, Student's t-test) in the mean SIR for benign lesions (mean, 0.58; SD, 0.02) as compared to malignant lesions (mean, 0.98; SD, 0.095); if the SIR of 0.80 was chosen as a cut-off, with > 0.8 defined as malignant and < 0.8 defined as a benign result, in-phase/opposed-phase imaging correctly identified 19 of 20 malignant lesions and 26 of 29 benign lesions (sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.89). Our results were in concordance with previous studies [32,34]. There were few limitations in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our study, an ADC cut-off value of 0.93 resulted in 88.9 % sensitivity, 95.5% specificity and 92.5% accuracy in the discrimination between benign and malignant vertebral marrow lesions. Though our cut-off was higher than that in previous studies, our results were in concordance with previous studies [29,31,32]. We also tried to find out the relationship between ADC of normal vertebral bodies and age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Post contrast enhancement of compression fracture is highly suggestive of underlying malignant in ltrative process. However, Zhou et al and Dalia et al reported enhancement in 9 out 17 of benign fractures, which all showed a signal drop on the out of phase image compared to the in phase image, a benign SIR, and were proved benign on follow up of patients, and thus the authors concluded contrast enhancement is not speci c for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions (7,12 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%