2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.07872
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative characteristics of cycles and their relations with stretch and spanning tree congestion

Abstract: The main goal of this article is to introduce new quantitative characteristics of cycles in finite simple connected graphs and to establish relations of these characteristics with the stretch and spanning tree congestion of graphs. The main new parameter is named the support number. We give a polynomial approximation algorithm for the support number with the aid of yet another characteristic we introduce, named the cycle width of the graph.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To find the longest geodesic cycle in a graph, Algorithm 4.1, "LIC -Longest Isometric Cycle" from Lokshtanov (2009) was implemented in Python in the longestIsometricCycle.py script. It is important to note that, as described in Catrina et al (2021), Lemma 3.6 of Lokshtanov (2009) is erroneous, and that therefore the algorithm is only correct for even-length cycles. For odd-length cycles, the conditions of this Lemma may be met for a particular cycle of length ๐‘˜ (for an odd value of ๐‘˜), and yet there is no cycle of length ๐‘˜ in the graph, and therefore the algorithm will incorrectly find that there is a geodesic cycle of length ๐‘˜.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To find the longest geodesic cycle in a graph, Algorithm 4.1, "LIC -Longest Isometric Cycle" from Lokshtanov (2009) was implemented in Python in the longestIsometricCycle.py script. It is important to note that, as described in Catrina et al (2021), Lemma 3.6 of Lokshtanov (2009) is erroneous, and that therefore the algorithm is only correct for even-length cycles. For odd-length cycles, the conditions of this Lemma may be met for a particular cycle of length ๐‘˜ (for an odd value of ๐‘˜), and yet there is no cycle of length ๐‘˜ in the graph, and therefore the algorithm will incorrectly find that there is a geodesic cycle of length ๐‘˜.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in Catrina et al (2021), there is an error in part of this proof, in the case of odd-length cycles, but the proof can be corrected using the even-length case with an auxiliary graph construction.…”
Section: Data Availability Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%