2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00572.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Changes in Forest Quality in a Principal Overwintering Area of the Monarch Butterfly in Mexico, 1971–1999

Abstract: Degradation of the oyamel fir‐pine forest ecosystem in central Mexico is a threat to the overwintering and migratory phenomenon of the eastern North American population of the monarch butterfly (   Danaus plexippus). Because a lack of quantitative data has hindered effective conservation policy, we photogrammatically analyzed the changing state of a major overwintering forest area. We analyzed stereographic aerial photographs of a 42,020‐ha area taken in 1971, 1984, and 1999 with GRASS, a geographic informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
89
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies on eastern monarchs, it has been posited that dwindling host plant populations (Flockhart et al 2015;Pleasants and Oberhauser 2012;Zalucki and Lammers 2010;Brower et al 2006), the use of insecticides (Krischik et al 2015;Pecenka and Lundgren 2015), and overwintering habitat destruction (Vidal and Rendon-Salinas 2014;Saenz-Romero et al 2012;Brower et al 2002) are primary drivers of decline. To our knowledge, a decline in milkweed abundance has not been reported within the range of the western monarch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies on eastern monarchs, it has been posited that dwindling host plant populations (Flockhart et al 2015;Pleasants and Oberhauser 2012;Zalucki and Lammers 2010;Brower et al 2006), the use of insecticides (Krischik et al 2015;Pecenka and Lundgren 2015), and overwintering habitat destruction (Vidal and Rendon-Salinas 2014;Saenz-Romero et al 2012;Brower et al 2002) are primary drivers of decline. To our knowledge, a decline in milkweed abundance has not been reported within the range of the western monarch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the overwintering monarchs in Mexico, severe weather and forest degradation are further stressors that compound habitat and host loss on breeding grounds in the USA (Brower et al 2012;Flockhart et al 2015). Despite apparent stressors and declines in monarchs at their overwintering grounds (Vidal and Rendon-Salinas 2014;Saenz-Romero et al 2012;Brower et al 2002), numbers have not declined at some of the fall stopover sites in the Eastern USA (e.g., Davis 2012) or summer breeding grounds (Ries et al 2015). Also, weather has not been considered to have a significant effect on the eastern Monarch population during spring and summer (Zalucki et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination of breeding, long-distance migration and overwintering behaviours and locations means that monarchs are potentially threatened not only by the elimination of their host plants (Asclepias spp.) throughout their breeding range, but also by the degradation and loss of their overwintering habitat [4][5][6]. In the southern Great Plains, monarch butterflies are uncommon or absent after the initial spring migration, suggesting that they move farther north in advance of high temperatures before passing back through the area during autumn migration [7 -10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discovery was certainly unexpected and is not readily explainable. At first glance, one might think that the thinning of the sanctuary's forest over the past three decades from illegal logging (Brower et al 2002) has gradually changed the microclimate, making it somehow less favourable for female survival in recent years. However, evidence to date does not indicate this species has any sex-related differences in cold tolerance to natural temperatures (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%