Quantitative Assessments of the Distinct Contributions of Polypeptide Backbone Amides versus Side Chain Groups to Chain Expansion via Chemical Denaturation

The functional native states of globular proteins become unstable at low temperatures, resulting in cold unfolding and impairment of normal biological function. Fundamental understanding of this phenomenon is essential to rationalizing the evolution of freeze-tolerant organisms and developing improved strategies for long-term preservation of biological materials. We present fully atomistic simulations of cold denaturation of an α-helical protein, the widely studied Trp-cage miniprotein. In contrast to the significant destabilization of the folded structure at high temperatures, Trp-cage cold denatures at 210 K into a compact, partially folded state; major elements of the secondary structure, including the α-helix, are conserved, but the salt bridge between aspartic acid and arginine is lost. The stability of Trp-cage's α-helix at low temperatures suggests a possible evolutionary explanation for the prevalence of such structures in antifreeze peptides produced by coldweather species, such as Arctic char. Although the 3 10 -helix is observed at cold conditions, its position is shifted toward Trp-cage's C-terminus. This shift is accompanied by intrusion of water into Trp-cage's interior and the hydration of buried hydrophobic residues. However, our calculations also show that the dominant contribution to the favorable energetics of low-temperature unfolding of Trp-cage comes from the hydration of hydrophilic residues.cold denaturation | Trp-cage miniprotein | protein folding T he functional native states of globular proteins that are stable near physiological conditions become labile when changes in temperature, pressure, and solvent composition alter their environment. The partial or complete unfolding of secondary and tertiary structure associated with this loss of stability can strongly affect protein behavior, leading to significantly impaired biological function (1, 2). Denaturation upon heating is a ubiquitous and well-studied phenomenon in which proteins gain configurational entropy and unfold as a result of increased kinetic energy. By contrast, the mechanisms responsible for pressure-induced unfolding, and for denaturation of globular proteins at low temperatures, remain incompletely understood (3-5).Fundamental understanding of cold denaturation is important due to its ecological implications and relevance to industrial processing of proteins and biological materials. Freeze-tolerant organisms such as the Arctic char, for example, thrive in subfreezing habitats where cold denaturation can occur (6). Biopharmaceuticals are also exposed to cold conditions that can result in denaturation when they are lyophilized into freeze-dried solids to prolong their shelf life (7,8). Natural cryoprotectants such as sugars and polyols stabilize proteins against denaturation in cold-weather species (6), and similar compounds have been used to mitigate the damaging effects of freeze-drying in pharmaceutical formulations (7, 9).Cold denaturation was first reported by Hopkins in 1930 (10). Brandts (11) subsequently observed ...

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

Computational investigation of cold denaturation in the Trp-cage miniprotein

Kim

Palmer

Debenedetti

2016

“…2C). Although direct H-bond interactions with the backbone explain the data well, the exact mechanism of ureainduced denaturation is still under debate (75)(76)(77)(78). We note that, based on time-resolved SAXS experiments, unfolded-state collapse of ubiquitin upon jumping from high to low denaturant concentration has been controversial [as for other proteins (36)], with some reports supporting (79,80) and others contradicting collapse (81).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Comprehensive structural and dynamical view of an unfolded protein from the combination of single-molecule FRET, NMR, and SAXS

Aznauryan

Delgado

Soranno

et al. 2016

141

167

The properties of unfolded proteins are essential both for the mechanisms of protein folding and for the function of the large group of intrinsically disordered proteins. However, the detailed structural and dynamical characterization of these highly dynamic and conformationally heterogeneous ensembles has remained challenging. Here we combine and compare three of the leading techniques for the investigation of unfolded proteins, NMR spectroscopy (NMR), smallangle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), with the goal of quantitatively testing their consistency and complementarity and for obtaining a comprehensive view of the unfolded-state ensemble. Using unfolded ubiquitin as a test case, we find that its average dimensions derived from FRET and from structural ensembles calculated using the program X-PLOR-NIH based on NMR and SAXS restraints agree remarkably well; even the shapes of the underlying intramolecular distance distributions are in good agreement, attesting to the reliability of the approaches. The NMR-based results provide a highly sensitive way of quantifying residual structure in the unfolded state. FRETbased nanosecond fluorescence correlation spectroscopy allows long-range distances and chain dynamics to be probed in a time range inaccessible by NMR. The combined techniques thus provide a way of optimally using the complementarity of the available methods for a quantitative structural and dynamical description of unfolded proteins both at the global and the local level.protein folding | unfolded protein ensemble | Förster resonance energy transfer | nuclear magnetic resonance | small-angle X-ray scattering P roteins exist as ensembles of interconverting conformations.Obviously, unfolded polypeptide chains, such as chemically or physically denatured proteins and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), can access extremely large numbers of conformations (1). A comprehensive description of their structural and dynamical behavior is a prerequisite for understanding protein folding (2-4) and the function of IDPs in health and disease (5, 6). Due to the very large number of conformational degrees of freedom of the unfolded polypeptide ensemble, it is of utmost importance to obtain as many independent experimental parameters as possible for a quantitative description of its behavior. Three experimental methods have been particularly informative in this respect: NMR spectroscopy (2, 5, 7-9), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) (10, 11), and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer spectroscopy (single-molecule FRET) (12, 13).NMR in solution provides very rich local structural and dynamical information at virtually any atom site with the exception of oxygen. Distance and angular information can be obtained from nuclear Overhauser enhancements (14), three-bond scalar couplings (15), paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PREs) (16), pseudo contact shifts (17), residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) (8, 18), chemical shifts (19), and hydrogen bond scalar ...

“…Poly(Gly) sequences have been observed to form collapsed or aggregated structures (24)(25)(26)(27)(28), and so we sought to determine whether a denatured state of sfAFP with 46% Gly content would behave similarly. To this end, we measured the properties of sfAFP H32W with reduced disulfide bonds using SAXS coupled with inline size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (Fig.…”

Section: Significancementioning

confidence: 99%

Perplexing cooperative folding and stability of a low-sequence complexity, polyproline 2 protein lacking a hydrophobic core

Gates

Baxa

et al. 2017

The burial of hydrophobic side chains in a protein core generally is thought to be the major ingredient for stable, cooperative folding. Here, we show that, for the snow flea antifreeze protein (sfAFP), stability and cooperativity can occur without a hydrophobic core, and without α-helices or β-sheets. sfAFP has low sequence complexity with 46% glycine and an interior filled only with backbone H-bonds between six polyproline 2 (PP2) helices. However, the protein folds in a kinetically two-state manner and is moderately stable at room temperature. We believe that a major part of the stability arises from the unusual match between residue-level PP2 dihedral angle bias in the unfolded state and PP2 helical structure in the native state. Additional stabilizing factors that compensate for the dearth of hydrophobic burial include shorter and stronger H-bonds, and increased entropy in the folded state. These results extend our understanding of the origins of cooperativity and stability in protein folding, including the balance between solvent and polypeptide chain entropies.protein folding | cooperativity | kinetics | PP2 | hydrogen bonding T he basis of protein-folding stability and cooperativity remains a topic of great interest (1, 2). Most studies have focused on proteins with hydrophobic cores containing α-helices and β-sheets. Here, we study the folding of snow flea antifreeze protein (sfAFP), a globular protein that lacks these features. The 81-residue protein has a novel fold that is distinct from other proteins (3-6), containing only polyproline 2 (PP2) helices and turns with a core filled with H-bonds and no hydrophobic groups (Fig. 1).The H-bond network between the PP2 helices (6), PP2 1-6 , requires close packing, which would be precluded by the presence of a C β atom. Thus, the PP2 helices are defined by glycine (Gly) repeats (GXX or GGX, where X is any other amino acid), which enable the hydrogen-bond network. As a consequence, the sfAFP molecule has a low-complexity glycine-rich sequence [37/81 Gly residues, or 46%; typical is 6, or 7% (7)]. The sfAFP core is well packed with essentially no interior void volumes, even when probed using a 0.5-Å radius sphere (8). sfAFP also contains two disulfide bonds, C1-C28 and C13-C43.Notably, no side chains are buried in sfAFP's core (2). All 12 hydrophobic side chains (V 4 , K 2 , and P 6 ) are surface exposed. Upon folding, sfAFP buries about 20 Å 2 ·res −1 of hydrophobic surface area compared with an average of 50 Å 2 ·res −1 for a set of 34 proteins of similar size (Fig. 2A). The difference equates to a decrease in stability of ∼1 or 1.4 kcal·mol −1 ·res −1 , assuming a surface tension coefficient of γ ∼ 34 or 47 cal·mol −1 ·Å −2 based on classical (9) or Flory-Huggins theory (10), respectively. Even the lower bound of 1 kcal·mol −1 ·res −1 represents a significant stability loss, and it is not obvious which energetic terms could compensate for the reduction in hydrophobic burial.Because hydrophobic burial is generally regarded as the basis of protein stability a...