2002
DOI: 10.1080/01431160110106050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of vegetation structural attributes from aerial photography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar relationships between canopy coverage and biomass have also been reported in the semiarid savanna of Sudan [53], and in semi-arid Senegal [54]. However, different vegetation types showed significantly different estimation accuracy [26].…”
Section: Indicators Of Carbon Stocks (C T )supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar relationships between canopy coverage and biomass have also been reported in the semiarid savanna of Sudan [53], and in semi-arid Senegal [54]. However, different vegetation types showed significantly different estimation accuracy [26].…”
Section: Indicators Of Carbon Stocks (C T )supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Estimates of canopy coverage derived from remote sensing images have also been applied as a proxy for calculating individual tree and stand biomass [25,26]. For example, Sousa et al [27] found that the tree canopy horizontal projection derived from QuickBird satellite images produced highly accurate estimates of AGB of Quercus rotundifolia at both individual and plot scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources of error that influence the user's ability to extract tree canopy cover that should be considered when utilizing aerial imagery to identify P-J woodland tree canopy cover include shadows, terrain effects, quality of imagery (spatial, spectral, and radiometric resolution), and incorrect orthorectification of measurement subplots (Fensham et al 2002;Jensen 2005;Browning et al 2009;Moffet 2009). For this study where we primarily dealt with P-J species, seasonal variations or the collection period of NAIP imagery was of less concern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted since 2002 by Fensham and his colleagues on the cover of semiarid eucalyptus in Australian woodlands (e.g., Fensham et al, 2002;Fensham and Fairfax, 2003;Fensham and Fairfax, 2007) using a manual interpretation method with a scaled 10 Â 10 reticule with open-centered crosses to identify sample points on aerial photographs with different scales. Models that describe woody structure from aerial photography to assess woodland vegetation cover changes were suggested.…”
Section: Data Acquisition Aerial Photo Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%