2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of the microstructural factors controlling the fatigue crack initiation mechanisms in AZ31 Mg alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the wide range of θ for the activation of pyramidal slip, as demonstrated in Figure 9D, is possibly responsible for the enhanced activity during cyclic torsional deformation. Similar results for high activity of nonbasal slip under torsional loading were also reported in earlier works 17, 26 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the wide range of θ for the activation of pyramidal slip, as demonstrated in Figure 9D, is possibly responsible for the enhanced activity during cyclic torsional deformation. Similar results for high activity of nonbasal slip under torsional loading were also reported in earlier works 17, 26 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Fatigue failure due to the initiation and propagation of cracks is one of the most important reasons for damage to structural components. [25][26][27] Thus, revealing cracking modes in Mg alloys is of significant value. 9,10,22,23,28 Yue et al 28 studied the high-cycle fatigue behavior of Mg-3.0Nd-0.2Zn-Zr alloy at RT and concluded that there were two typical cracking modes: persistent slip band (PSB)-induced cracking caused by the accumulation of slip-associated strain localization and tension twinning (TTW)-induced cracking caused by TTW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, cracking modes after fatigue failure of Mg alloys also show a high dependency on strain amplitude. [31][32][33][34] For example, Wang et al 32 found the microcracks of the GW83 sheets after tensioncompression fatigue failure were preferentially initiated at grain boundaries (GBs) and intergranularly propagated at 1.2% strain amplitude while cracks were mainly initiated at slip traces (ST) and the crack growth is primarily transgranular at 0.5% strain amplitude. They suggested the higher activity of dislocation slip at higher strain amplitude would promote the coalescence of cracks to form long intergranular cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%