2003
DOI: 10.1080/02786820300975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of the Effect of Surface Deposition and Coagulation on the Dynamics of Submicrometer Particles Indoors

Abstract: Exposure to airborne particles indoors depends on particle concentration, which is affected by air filtration, ventilation, and particle dynamics. The aim of this work was quantitative assessment of the effects of coagulation, surface deposition, and ventilation on the submicrometer particle concentration indoors. The assessment was obtained from measured particle loss rate and deposition velocity parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with those that are reported by Nazaroff and Cass (1986) and Grøntoft and Raychaudhuri (2004). The estimation of deposition rates and velocities from experimental data employing methods similar to the methodology presented in Appendix 1 is common in the international literature (Thatcher and Layton 1995;Jamriska and Morawska 2003;Howard-Reed et al 2003). It should be noted that deviation of the k τ parameter, as was estimated here, from the actual deposition rate, would become higher as consumption through chemical reactions becomes more intense.…”
Section: Model Applicationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are in agreement with those that are reported by Nazaroff and Cass (1986) and Grøntoft and Raychaudhuri (2004). The estimation of deposition rates and velocities from experimental data employing methods similar to the methodology presented in Appendix 1 is common in the international literature (Thatcher and Layton 1995;Jamriska and Morawska 2003;Howard-Reed et al 2003). It should be noted that deviation of the k τ parameter, as was estimated here, from the actual deposition rate, would become higher as consumption through chemical reactions becomes more intense.…”
Section: Model Applicationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The parameter (m 3 s −1 ) represents the coagulation coefficient for the entire size distribution. The deposition rate is considered constant in agreement with experimental results of previous works on deposition (Jamriska & Morawska (2003); Lai, 2002;Nazaroff, 2004;Nomura, Hopke, Fitzgerald, & Mesbah, 1997;Okuyama et al, 1986). The coagulation coefficient depends on particle size.…”
Section: Assessment Of Simultaneous Coagulation and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The decay of the total number of particles in a chamber has been used in some studies to obtain the coagulation coefficient rate (Chen, Namenyi, Yeh, Mauderly, & Cuddihy, 1990;Keith & Derrick, 1960;Kim et al, 2003;Robinson & Yu, 1999) and in some studies to derive the deposition loss rates (Jamriska & Morawska, 2003;Ligocki, Liu, Cass, & John, 1990;Mosley et al, 2001;Okuyama et al, 1986). When the initial number concentration is sufficiently high simultaneous deposition and coagulation affects the development of the size distribution.…”
Section: Assessment Of Simultaneous Coagulation and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UFP, PAH). Particle number and mass deposition in the chamber was assessed by measuring number and volume concentration decay rates (see Jamriska and Morawska, 2003) with tobacco smoke and with condensation-generated diethylhexylsebecate (DEHS) test aerosol of size characteristics similar to tobacco smoke. For UFP number emissions, number deposition was inferred from waterpipe smoke decay measurements following removal of the waterpipe from the dilution tunnel or following the end of DEHS injection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%