2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of the absorbed dose in cryodeposited noble-gas films under X-ray irradiation: Simulation vs. experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 keV). Basically, the absorbed dose rate in xenon for the actual X-ray spectrum used in this work is higher than that in argon because of the difference in the X-ray absorption coefficients for Ar and Xe (the ratio depends on the sample thickness 36 ). However, it should be noted that the shape and thickness of the sample in our experimental configuration may vary from experiment to experiment, which causes considerable uncertainty in the average absorbed dose rate (up to a factor of 1.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 keV). Basically, the absorbed dose rate in xenon for the actual X-ray spectrum used in this work is higher than that in argon because of the difference in the X-ray absorption coefficients for Ar and Xe (the ratio depends on the sample thickness 36 ). However, it should be noted that the shape and thickness of the sample in our experimental configuration may vary from experiment to experiment, which causes considerable uncertainty in the average absorbed dose rate (up to a factor of 1.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 keV). The absorbed dose rate in the noble gas matrix samples was estimated in our earlier work 75 by using data from a calibrated Fricke dosimeter and Geant4 calculations of ratios of the absorbed dose rate in the 80 μm Ar matrix to that in the dosimeter. The value of the absorbed dose rates in an Ar matrix is 38.6 Gy s −1 (in the cryostat used for FTIR experiments).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorbed dose rate for the samples was evaluated using the Fricke dosimeter and Monte–Carlo simulations; the details are given elsewhere. 37 The estimated absorbed dose rates for Ar, Kr and Xe matrices were approximately 36.0–41.9, 64.7–83.3 and 48.6–63.9 Gy s −1 , respectively. Photolysis of samples was carried out by a P-1532hoz low-pressure mercury lamp with a synthetic quartz tube through a MgF 2 cryostat window.…”
Section: Experimental and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 91%