2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of WT1 gene expression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a useful tool for monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in cancer patients requires a precise evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment. In hematological malignancies, and particularly in acute and chronic leukemia, definition of remission often requires not only a morphological analysis, but also lack of disease evidence at sub-microscopic level. This is highly important after a potentially curative approach as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), where early detection of relapse may lead to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
57
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the WT1 gene is expressed in O90% of AML cases at diagnosis and it is stable over time; in addition, standardized quantitative methods for its expression detection are available [18]. Therefore, expression of WT1 is currently considered an adequate and reliable marker for monitoring molecular MRD in the postchemotherapy and post-SCT phase [18,35,36]. However, it is documented that, in the post-allo-SCT phase, the time to recurrence of this MRD marker relative to the subsequent cytological relapse can be variable and, if overexpression of WT1 is too close to cytological relapse, an early and effective preemptive therapy may be unworkable [36].…”
Section: Transplantation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the WT1 gene is expressed in O90% of AML cases at diagnosis and it is stable over time; in addition, standardized quantitative methods for its expression detection are available [18]. Therefore, expression of WT1 is currently considered an adequate and reliable marker for monitoring molecular MRD in the postchemotherapy and post-SCT phase [18,35,36]. However, it is documented that, in the post-allo-SCT phase, the time to recurrence of this MRD marker relative to the subsequent cytological relapse can be variable and, if overexpression of WT1 is too close to cytological relapse, an early and effective preemptive therapy may be unworkable [36].…”
Section: Transplantation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WT1 expression has already been shown to be a helpful marker in patients with AML after chemotherapy, 19,[21][22][23] after autologous 24 and after conventional allogeneic HCT. [25][26][27] In this analysis, the ability of different markers to predict relapse following allogeneic HCT with RIC was analyzed both alone and in combination. Peripheral blood (PB) cell WT1 expression levels quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were compared with the detection of diseasespecific (DS) markers by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, post-transplant WT1 expression was the strongest predictor of outcome in multivariate analysis and was found to be a useful marker to select patients for preemptive immune intervention (DLI, tapering of immunosuppressive therapy). Comparable data were reported in a smaller number of patients monitored before and after transplant (21,22). However, discordant results on prognosis were obtained when MFC and WT1 levels were compared (40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Wt1 As Minimal Residual Disease Marker In Allogeneic Stem Cementioning
confidence: 56%
“…On the contrary, a greater agreement was found among groups that have used WT1 levels as a marker of minimal residual disease (MRD) in AML remission BMs (less than 5% of blast cells). In particular, WT1 expression has been shown to predict disease progression in AML patients treated with conventional chemotherapy (8)(9)(10)(15)(16)(17) and patients undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Furthermore, when WT1 expression was compared with widely used techniques in monitoring MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (23) or specific molecular targets such as fusion genes transcripts (PMLRARa, AML-ETO1, and CBFb-MYH11), comparable sensitivities were found in predicting the relapse in AML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%