2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of engineering geological suitability for multilayer Urban Underground Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple efforts have been made to evaluate the so-called UUS resources, including physical space, geothermal energy, groundwater, and geomaterials. Some works, principally those from the Deep City Project [4,26,27,126,127], consider the four UUS assets comprehensively, while others deal with only one or two (mostly on physical space [128][129][130][131]) of the four UUS assets. The recent work of Price et al [132] incorporated the UUS asset of space continuum into the framework of ground-use optimization.…”
Section: Integrated Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple efforts have been made to evaluate the so-called UUS resources, including physical space, geothermal energy, groundwater, and geomaterials. Some works, principally those from the Deep City Project [4,26,27,126,127], consider the four UUS assets comprehensively, while others deal with only one or two (mostly on physical space [128][129][130][131]) of the four UUS assets. The recent work of Price et al [132] incorporated the UUS asset of space continuum into the framework of ground-use optimization.…”
Section: Integrated Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e subjective weights for evaluation indices are determined based on the FAHP proposed by Chang [43]. In FAHP, the triangular fuzzy number (TFN) in Table 2 is recommended to represent the relative importance scale between objects [30,44,45].…”
Section: Subjective Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…irdly, the weights of evaluation indices in each comparison matrix were calculated fowling the FAHP. As the FAHP has been recorded in literature [33,44,45], the weight calculation process is omitted in this research and only the calculation results were presented in Tables 3-4. Finally, the global weights for all the evaluation indices were synthesized and presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Subjective Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise comparisons by experts determined the relative importance of each criterion. Lu and colleagues [29] also evaluated geological suitability for underground construction referring to expert opinion on geotechnical properties, geological structure, geomorphology, hydrogeology and adverse geological conditions. Their case study of the Wuchang Railway Station mapped suitability values according to the depth at which development was forecasted.…”
Section: Deep City: Resources To Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used in the Qingdao study includes distributions of land uses, population densities, transit networks or property status, but these are understood as indicators of possible demand [26]. Lu and colleagues [29], in their rail station case study, only evaluate geological suitability, independently of the station's urban context. The urban form is not only a passive source of demand, but also supplies a particular potential that is both latent and actual.…”
Section: Introduction: Mapping the Urban Undergroundmentioning
confidence: 99%