2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of Diagnostic Radiation Doses in Adult Blunt Trauma Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the standard practice protocols for evaluating patients extricated and immobilized on arrival at the trauma center have trended toward pan-scanning (18). Using principles of selective spinal immobilization as has been advocated by others, we are of the opinion that full spinal immobilization in a conscious, cooperative, neurologically intact driver without focal severe spinal pain or neurological symptoms suggestive of spinal cord or nerve root injury is rarely necessary (8,19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, the standard practice protocols for evaluating patients extricated and immobilized on arrival at the trauma center have trended toward pan-scanning (18). Using principles of selective spinal immobilization as has been advocated by others, we are of the opinion that full spinal immobilization in a conscious, cooperative, neurologically intact driver without focal severe spinal pain or neurological symptoms suggestive of spinal cord or nerve root injury is rarely necessary (8,19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the study period, 60 major trauma patients were admitted to our centre, 36 of which met inclusion criteria (78% male with median (IQR) age 38 (27-68) years) with a median (IQR) ISS of 25 (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) and ICU stay of 5 (2-10) days. Injuries were predominantly due to blunt trauma (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of note that a subset of more severely injured patients in this cohort received radiation doses from CT in excess of 100 mSv. Winslow et al 19 looked at the radiation dose in the first 24 h received by less severely injured US trauma patients. In all, 92% of their population had a whole-body CT ('pan-scan'), and the median dose was 40.2 mSv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 CT use in the investigation of trauma patients has increased significantly during the past two decades, 3 which may further increase the burden of radiationinduced malignancy on society. Several recent studies [4][5][6][7][8][9] have examined the radiation dose to trauma patients during their hospital stay, but only one study 8 has examined the radiation exposure associated with the patient's resuscitative phase of care and diagnosis. This study by Winslow et al excluded the most severelyinjured patients and did not consider tests done at referring centres, despite evidence to show that patients who are transferred from regional centres have higher total doses of radiation than those imaged at the trauma centre only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%