2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coemr.2022.100421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative approaches in clinical reproductive endocrinology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have also focused on the effects of demographic, endocrine, and genetic data to optimize OS, and therewith predict the retrieval of mature oocytes [16][17][18] . Although these are retrospective studies, they highlight the need to explore available characteristics and further assess their impact on clinical outcomes when determining dosing regimens, whereby endocrine monitoring or genomic sequencing for ART cycles may be efficacious for some patients 19,20 . To best identify such predictors in an unbiased manner, the treatment cycles of patients should not exist in both the training and test sets 21 .…”
Section: Gonadotropin Dosing For Ovarian Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies have also focused on the effects of demographic, endocrine, and genetic data to optimize OS, and therewith predict the retrieval of mature oocytes [16][17][18] . Although these are retrospective studies, they highlight the need to explore available characteristics and further assess their impact on clinical outcomes when determining dosing regimens, whereby endocrine monitoring or genomic sequencing for ART cycles may be efficacious for some patients 19,20 . To best identify such predictors in an unbiased manner, the treatment cycles of patients should not exist in both the training and test sets 21 .…”
Section: Gonadotropin Dosing For Ovarian Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation data from the VISA Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04969822), a noninferiority, prospective, multi-center RCT may further reflect the clinical impact of AI-driven systems compared to manual morphology assessment by embryologists for day-5 embryos. Such studies highlight the necessity for the accuracy of predictions made via AI techniques to be prospectively validated prior to adoption into clinical practice with appropriate mitigation of study biases and evaluation of costeffectiveness 20,93 .…”
Section: Morphokinetics and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation