Quantitative and Qualitative Running Gait Analysis through an Innovative Video-Based Approach

Abstract

Quantitative and qualitative running gait analysis allows the early identification and the longitudinal monitoring of gait abnormalities linked to running-related injuries. A promising calibration- and marker-less video sensor-based technology (i.e., Graal), recently validated for walking gait, may also offer a time- and cost-efficient alternative to the gold-standard methods for running. This study aim was to ascertain the validity of an improved version of Graal for quantitative and qualitative analysis of running. In 33 healthy recreational runners (mean age 41 years), treadmill running at self-selected submaximal speed was simultaneously evaluated by a validated photosensor system (i.e., Optogait—the reference methodology) and by the video analysis of a posterior 30-fps video of the runner through the optimized version of Graal. Graal is video analysis software that provides a spectral analysis of the brightness over time for each pixel of the video, in order to identify its frequency contents. The two main frequencies of variation of the pixel’s brightness (i.e., F1 and F2) correspond to the two most important frequencies of gait (i.e., stride frequency and cadence). The Optogait system recorded step length, cadence, and its variability (vCAD, a traditional index of gait quality). Graal provided a direct measurement of F2 (reflecting cadence), an indirect measure of step length, and two indexes of global gait quality (harmony and synchrony index). The correspondence between quantitative indexes (Cadence vs. F2 and step length vs. Graal step length) was tested via paired t-test, correlations, and Bland–Altman plots. The relationship between qualitative indexes (vCAD vs. Harmony and Synchrony Index) was investigated by correlation analysis. Cadence and step length were, respectively, not significantly different from and highly correlated with F2 (1.41 Hz ± 0.09 Hz vs. 1.42 Hz ± 0.08 Hz, p = 0.25, r2 = 0.81) and Graal step length (104.70 cm ± 013.27 cm vs. 107.56 cm ± 13.67 cm, p = 0.55, r2 = 0.98). Bland–Altman tests confirmed a non-significant bias and small imprecision between methods for both parameters. The vCAD was 1.84% ± 0.66%, and it was significantly correlated with neither the Harmony nor the Synchrony Index (0.21 ± 0.03, p = 0.92, r2 = 0.00038; 0.21 ± 0.96, p = 0.87, r2 = 0.00122). These findings confirm the validity of the optimized version of Graal for the measurement of quantitative indexes of gait. Hence, Graal constitutes an extremely time- and cost-efficient tool suitable for quantitative analysis of running. However, its validity for qualitative running gait analysis remains inconclusive and will require further evaluation in a wider range of absolute and relative running intensities in different individuals.

A Case–Control Study of the Effects of Chronic Low Back Pain in Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters

“…Once it was detected, it was the one that was considered during the 30 s (sec) that lasted the measurement procedure according to protocol [ 11 ]. The OptoGait optical data sensor system was used for its reliability [ 2 , 24 ]. Although the subjects walked for two minutes until they adapted to the situation, only the last 30 s were evaluated.…”

Human Movement Quality Assessment Using Sensor Technologies in Recreational and Professional Sports: A Scoping Review

“…The consecutive blinded title and abstract screening of the remaining 132 articles resulted in 41 eligible and 91 excluded papers. After the full-text screening, 16 articles were included in this review [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], consisting of journal articles and conference proceedings from 2017 to 2021 (see Figure 3).…”

“…Two studies of karate and alpine skiing included only professional athletes (2 and 19, respectively) [33,38]. Ten articles included solely recreational athletes performing body-weight exercises, Nordic walking, pair dance or treadmill running [23][24][25][26][27][28]32,[35][36][37]. Four studies included recreational and professional athletes in the fields of karate, table tennis, triathlon and canoeing [29][30][31]34].…”

Knee Joint Menisci Are Shock Absorbers: A Biomechanical In-Vitro Study on Porcine Stifle Joints

“…A total of ten frequencies (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Hz) were arranged randomly for each knee and scanned directly one after the other, in accordance with this randomized sequence. The frequency range was adapted from Pereira et al (2014 ) and cropped to the frequencies that match best to those observed during gait, running, and other daily activities ( Danion et al, 2003 ; Simoni et al, 2021 ). The sampling rate was adapted to the respective frequency in a way that 1,000 values were recorded per single sinusoidal oscillation, resulting in a total of 10,000 measurement points per DMA run.…”