2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and qualitative demand for slum and non-slum housing in Delhi: Empirical evidences from household data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notes ***: p-value < 0.01, **: p-value < 0.05, *: p-value < 0.1; DV Total Floor Area (log); slum samples include both owner and renter households corresponding housing consumption by 4.2, 4.5, and 2.6 %, ceteris paribus. The income elasticities are consistent with previous studies, which showed that income elasticities in developing countries are inelastic, with little difference between owner and renter households (Ahmad et al 2013;Malpezzi and Mayo 1987;Tiwari and Parikh 1998). The income elasticities are smaller in magnitude from the earlier study in urban India, where income elasticities for both owner and renter households were 0.9 (Tiwari and Parikh 1998), and urban Bangladesh, where income elasticities for owner, renter, and slums were 0.69, 0.67, and 0.39, respectively (Ahmad 2015).…”
Section: P-valuesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notes ***: p-value < 0.01, **: p-value < 0.05, *: p-value < 0.1; DV Total Floor Area (log); slum samples include both owner and renter households corresponding housing consumption by 4.2, 4.5, and 2.6 %, ceteris paribus. The income elasticities are consistent with previous studies, which showed that income elasticities in developing countries are inelastic, with little difference between owner and renter households (Ahmad et al 2013;Malpezzi and Mayo 1987;Tiwari and Parikh 1998). The income elasticities are smaller in magnitude from the earlier study in urban India, where income elasticities for both owner and renter households were 0.9 (Tiwari and Parikh 1998), and urban Bangladesh, where income elasticities for owner, renter, and slums were 0.69, 0.67, and 0.39, respectively (Ahmad 2015).…”
Section: P-valuesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…() modeled the individual demand for housing over the life cycle by showing the aggregate implications of their behavior. Ahmad et al () estimated qualitative and quantitative demand for housing using a household survey in Delhi and indicated that housing demand is inelastic with respect to price and income. These kinds of simulations were based on mathematical equations and assumptions rather than consumer preferences.…”
Section: Literature Review and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of housing demand in Delhi, Ahmad et al (2012) found that, outside of slums, housing demand is relatively responsive to income, and less responsive to changes in price. Within slums, the opposite is true, suggesting that slum dwellers have to prioritize other consumption as their incomes rise, consistent with a hierarchical model of consumption.…”
Section: Prices Of Satisfiers Of Materials Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedro (2009) categorizes responses to different amounts of living space as "pathological", "negatively satisfied", "neutral", and "positively satisfied". His categories provide a useful frame for thinking about these non-satiable but necessary material satisfiers, while Ahmad's study of housing demand (Ahmad et al, 2012) provides insights into different consumer responses at different levels of satisfaction. It is plausible that Ahmad's slum residents, who were much more responsive to quantity of living space than quality, were somewhere in the range from pathological to negative satisfaction.…”
Section: Satisfiability and Satiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%