Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through maybe Coercive Citations

Abstract

How much is the h-index of an editor of a well ranked journal improved due to citations which occur after his/her appointment? Scientific recognition within academia is widely measured nowadays by the number of citations or h-index. Our dataset is based on a sample of four editors from a well ranked journal (impact factor -IF -greater than 2). The target group consists of two editors who seem to benefit by their position through an increased citation number (and subsequently h-index) within journal. The total amount of citations for the target group is bigger than 600. The control group is formed by another set of two editors from the same journal whose relations between their positions and their citation records remain neutral. The total amount of citations for the control group is more than 1200. The timespan for which citations' pattern has been studied is 1975-2015. Previous coercive citations for a journal benefit (increase its IF) has been signaled. To the best of our knowledge, this is a pioneering work on coercive citations for personal (editors') benefit. Editorial teams should be aware about this type of potentially unethical behavior and act accordingly.

Determinants of the quality of research outputs by librarians in selected university libraries in south east Nigeria

“…Editors will have widely varying expectations depending on prior experience (or lack thereof) with library and/ or commercial publisher. Herteliu et al (2017) observed that editors have the ability to influence the hindex of authors. According to Bogdanovic (2003), the quality of journals rests, to a large degree, on the quality of peer review process.…”