2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and kinetic analyses of peanut allergens as affected by food processing

Abstract: Highlight Seven thermal processing methods were conducted on peanuts at the palatable ranges. Proteins in water soluble and insoluble fractions were extracted and tested for allergen reactivity. The kinetics of the reactions caused by thermal processing was characterized. Frying (6 min) was the best to reduce IgE binding to Ara h 2 among all the methods with optimal processing point.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] All peanut proteins (Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6) are water-soluble proteins. [23] It can be hypothesized that Ara h 1 and 3 are subjected to degradation by lysosomal proteases, which results in the degradation of IgE binding epitopes and subsequently in reduced IgE binding, whereas Ara h 2 and 6 are less degraded by lysosomal proteases. This hypothesis is supported by Smit et al who investigated the processing of peanut allergens in dendritic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] All peanut proteins (Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6) are water-soluble proteins. [23] It can be hypothesized that Ara h 1 and 3 are subjected to degradation by lysosomal proteases, which results in the degradation of IgE binding epitopes and subsequently in reduced IgE binding, whereas Ara h 2 and 6 are less degraded by lysosomal proteases. This hypothesis is supported by Smit et al who investigated the processing of peanut allergens in dendritic cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 76 ), allergen Glycyrrhiza uralensis ( 64 ), hazelnut allergens ( 78 ), olive pollen allergens ( 2 ), raw and roasted peanut allergens ( 71 ), N-glycoforms of soybean allergenic glycoproteins ( 91 ), allergens from seeds of Ginkgo biloba ( 80 ), and almond and hazelnut allergens from roasted nut ( 20 ). Immunological analysis such as immunoblotting was also applied after SDS-PAGE separation e.g., to egg yolk allergens ( 26 ), peanut allergens ( 92 ), Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) allergen ( 93 ), Gly m 4, a soybean allergen ( 21 ), citrus fruit allergens ( 94 ), and tree nuts ( 95 ).…”
Section: Methods For the Detection And Analysis Of Allergensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to the research reports on the effects of food processing on peanut allergens, the processing effects on wheat allergens have been modestly studied (Blanc et al, 2011;Meng et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019). Wheat food products are made using two general types of processing methods to create commonly consumed foods (Table 1):…”
Section: Impact Of Food Processing On Wheat Allergenicity: Evidence From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%