2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of tiropramide in human plasma by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for application to a bioequivalence test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the previously reported PK parameter values of tiropramide were similar to our PK results obtained by NCA analysis. After oral administration of 100 mg of tiropramide in humans, the obtained NCA PK parameters (as previously reported values) were 2.34-6.99 h for t 1/2 , 0.66-1.6 h for T max , 77.4-111 ng/mL for C max , and 267.7-812.7 h•ng/mL for AUC [6,12,[18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, the NCA PK parameters in this study were 3.41 ± 1.99 h for t 1/2 , 1.74 ± 0.63 h for T max , 69.07 ± 59.74 ng/mL for C max , and 280.34 ± 199.96 h•ng/mL for AUC, which were similar to the previously reported values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In other words, the previously reported PK parameter values of tiropramide were similar to our PK results obtained by NCA analysis. After oral administration of 100 mg of tiropramide in humans, the obtained NCA PK parameters (as previously reported values) were 2.34-6.99 h for t 1/2 , 0.66-1.6 h for T max , 77.4-111 ng/mL for C max , and 267.7-812.7 h•ng/mL for AUC [6,12,[18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, the NCA PK parameters in this study were 3.41 ± 1.99 h for t 1/2 , 1.74 ± 0.63 h for T max , 69.07 ± 59.74 ng/mL for C max , and 280.34 ± 199.96 h•ng/mL for AUC, which were similar to the previously reported values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Literature search revealed that very few pharmacokinetic studies are published and the reported methods are based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [2], gas chromatography/nitrogen phosphorus detector [3,4] semi-micro HPLC using column switching [5] and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry [6]. Although the reported methods are sensitive and accurate but are expensive, and labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%