Quantitative Analysis of the Sources of Construction Waste

Abstract

The construction industry is traditionally environmentally unfriendly. The environmental impacts of construction waste include soil contamination, water contamination, and deterioration of landscape. Also, construction waste has a negative economic impact by contributing additional cost to construction due to the need to replace wasted materials. However, in order to mitigate waste, construction managers have to explore management options, which include reduction, recycling, and disposal of wastes. Reduction has the highest priority among the waste management options but efficient reduction cannot be achieved without adequate identification of the sources of waste. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present a study that was carried out on the contribution rates of nine identified sources of construction waste. Establishing the contribution rates of different waste sources will enhance knowledge-based decision-making in developing appropriate strategy for mitigating construction waste. Quantitative research method, using survey questionnaire, was adopted in this study to assess the frequency and severity of contribution of the sources of waste. As one of the findings of the study, residual waste such as material off-cuts was identified as the highest contributor to construction waste. This study consequently demonstrated that waste has a significant contribution to the cost of construction.

An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: A mini-review

“…It was concluded that efficient materials procurement measures could help in minimising CDW and financial loss of projects. According to a study carried out in the UK by Fadiya et al (2014), it is claimed that inefficient materials procurement, among other eight factors, contributes about 11.2% towards total generated CDW as shown in Figure 6. Also, Ajayi et al (2017a) claimed that materials procurement is responsible for purchasing the wasted materials, and it was also claimed that materials procurement contributes up to 50% of the total project cost.…”

“…Different factors contributing to construction and demolition waste (CDW) generation in the UK.Source:Fadiya et al, 2014. …”

Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction: Thailand’s Perspective

“…Construction methods and planning (COPL) and material and procurement (MAPR) are surprisingly the categories of low impact. Adewuyi and Otali [47] and Fadiys et al [49] also confirmed that design and documentation was the leading source of construction waste. On the basis of the research of Ekanayake and Ofori [39], design, operational, procurement, and material handling contribute to increase waste on the construction site.…”

“…A study by Fadiya et al [49] found nine sources of construction waste in the U.K. construction industry. These were residual, design, handling, data error, operations, others, misplacement, weather, and vandalism.…”

Construction and Demolition Waste in Romania: The Route from Illegal Dumping to Building Materials

“…Effective implementation of construction waste sorting requires a wide range of factors involving human beings, management, technology, environment and resources [57]. Furthermore, a reliable estimation of costs associated with waste flows will help decision-makers to enhance the appropriate strategy that can mitigate the C&DW generation [58].…”