2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02210-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of noncoding RNA from paired fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, our study design did not include a comparison between fixed and non-fixed tissue sample to test the limitations of the FFPE extraction step. However, the available literature reports comparing paired fresh and FFPE tissues show that even though RNA integrity can decrease during FFPE extraction, reproducible and highly correlated gene expression data can be obtained from FFPE samples of various tissue types, including breast cancer subtypes [32][33][34][35]. In addition, the use of more than one representative cell line for each breast cancer subtype would have been ideal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, our study design did not include a comparison between fixed and non-fixed tissue sample to test the limitations of the FFPE extraction step. However, the available literature reports comparing paired fresh and FFPE tissues show that even though RNA integrity can decrease during FFPE extraction, reproducible and highly correlated gene expression data can be obtained from FFPE samples of various tissue types, including breast cancer subtypes [32][33][34][35]. In addition, the use of more than one representative cell line for each breast cancer subtype would have been ideal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of the situation with other methods, it is necessary to consider this issue for RT-qPCR measurements of clinical samples. Moreover, the specific problem of FFPE material needs clarification 31 , 62 - 64 . New RNA quality metrics, which are more sensitive than the RIN values generally used up to now, are recommended to define the preanalytical RNA conditions for reliable expression analyses in future studies 63 , 64 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might also change the potential degrading activity of endonucleases on total RNA under these conditions. Some studies have noted potential difficulties in quantifying circRNAs in degraded total RNA samples 7 , 13 , 30 , 31 . Therefore, it is surprising that the majority of recent circRNA expression-related studies in cancer tissues have ignored the possible influence of RIN on the measured values ( Table S1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study evaluated the stability of several circRNAs, including circ-AFF1, in the hearts of mice within 8 days after death, and concluded that, as reference genes, circRNAs were more stable than other kinds of RNAs are in dead bodies [ 107 , 108 ]. Studies also reported that circRNAs presented relatively consistent and stable expression profiles in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues compared with their corresponding linear transcripts [ 128 ]. However, real-world conditions are much more complicated than laboratory conditions, especially with postmortem cases.…”
Section: Circrnas As Novel Biomarkers In Postmortem Scd Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, real-world conditions are much more complicated than laboratory conditions, especially with postmortem cases. Using short amplicons and standardized RT-qPCR assays in autopsy cases might improve the possibility of performing accurate quantitative analysis of circRNAs [ 128 ]. On the plus side, forensic scientists can obtain sufficient tissue samples through autopsies, even including some unconventional samples such as pericardial fluid, which also expands the conditions for the selection of appropriate biomarkers.…”
Section: Circrnas As Novel Biomarkers In Postmortem Scd Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%