Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI

Abstract

Purpose: In quantitative PET/MR imaging, attenuation correction (AC) of PET data is markedly challenged by the need of deriving accurate attenuation maps from MR images. A number of strategies have been developed for MRI-guided attenuation correction with different degrees of success. In this work, we compare the quantitative performance of three generic AC methods, including standard 3-class MR segmentation-based, advanced atlasregistration-based and emission-based approaches in the context of brain time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI. Materials and methods: Fourteen patients referred for diagnostic MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT brain scans were included in this comparative study. For each study, PET images were reconstructed using four different attenuation maps derived from CT-based AC (CTAC) serving as reference, standard 3-class MR-segmentation, atlas-registration and emission-based AC methods. To generate 3-class attenuation maps, T1-weighted MRI images were segmented into background air, fat and soft-tissue classes followed by assignment of constant linear attenuation coefficients of 0, 0.0864 and 0.0975 cm −1 to each class, respectively. A robust atlas-registration based AC method was developed for pseudo-CT generation using local weighted fusion of atlases based on their morphological similarity to target MR images. Our recently proposed MRI-guided maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm was employed to estimate the attenuation map from TOF emission data. The performance of the different AC algorithms in terms of prediction of bones and quantification of PET tracer uptake was objectively evaluated with respect to reference CTAC maps and CTAC-PET images.Results: Qualitative evaluation showed that the MLAA-AC method could sparsely estimate bones and accurately differentiate them from air cavities. It was found that the atlas-AC method can accurately predict bones with variable errors in defining air cavities. Quantitative assessment of bone extraction accuracy based on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) showed that MLAA-AC and atlas-AC resulted in DSC mean values of 0.79 and 0.92, respectively, in all patients. The MLAA-AC and atlas-AC methods predicted mean linear attenuation coefficients of 0.107 and 0.134 cm . The evaluation of the relative change in tracer uptake within 32 distinct regions of the brain with respect to CTAC PET images showed that the 3-class MRAC, MLAA-AC and atlas-AC methods resulted in quantification errors of −16.2 ± 3.6%, −13.3 ± 3.3% and 1.0 ± 3.4%, respectively. Linear regression and Bland-Altman concordance plots showed that both 3-class MRAC and MLAA-AC methods result in a significant systematic bias in PET tracer uptake, while the atlas-AC method results in a negligible bias. Conclusion: The standard 3-class MRAC method significantly underestimated cerebral PET tracer uptake. While current state-of-the-art MLAA-AC methods look promising, they were unable to noticeably reduce quantification errors in the context of brain imaging. Conversely, the propose...

Whole‐body bone segmentation from MRI for PET/MRI attenuation correction using shape‐based averaging

“…In addition, application of dedicated MR sequences enabling to delineate bony structures, such as ultra-short echo time (UTE) 12 or zero time echo (ZTE), 13 in whole-body imaging is not yet clinically feasible owing to the long acquisition time and susceptibility to artifacts when using a large field-of-view. As such, the use of atlas-based methods for identification of bone tissue is common practice in MRI-guided attenuation generation in brain [14][15][16][17] and more importantly in whole-body imaging. [18][19][20] Despite promising potential reported in the literature, we observed that the SBA technique tends to underestimate bone volume identification in a comparative assessment of common atlas-based bone segmentation techniques from MRI using a set of MR/CT image pairs.…”

From simultaneous to synergistic MR‐PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR‐PET imaging methodologies

“…transmission scan. Although these methods show promise for accurate attenuation correction of PET images from MR-PET scanners in the presence of MR metallic artefacts, they still produce noticeable quantification bias in the context of brain PET imaging(Mehranian, Arabi, & Zaidi, 2016). Although these methods show promise for accurate attenuation correction of PET images from MR-PET scanners in the presence of MR metallic artefacts, they still produce noticeable quantification bias in the context of brain PET imaging(Mehranian, Arabi, & Zaidi, 2016).…”

Pypes: Workflows for Processing Multimodal Neuroimaging Data

“…A synchronized acquisition allows the use of MRI information for attenuation correction (AC) of PET images, though there is no consensus on the best algorithm (Cabello et al, 2016; Mehranian et al, 2016; Ladefoged et al, 2017). Future works will include the proposed AC algorithms in the PET/MRI pipelines of Pypes.…”